this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
514 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

80478 readers
3655 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The article title is click bait here is the full article:

Wondering what your career looks like in our increasingly uncertain, AI-powered future? According to Palantir CEO Alex Karp, it’s going to involve less of the comfortable office work to which most people aspire, a more old fashioned grunt work with your hands.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum yesterday, Karp insisted that the future of work is vocational — not just for those already in manufacturing and the skilled trades, but for the majority of humanity.

In the age of AI, Karp told attendees at a forum, a strong formal education in any of the humanities will soon spell certain doom.

“You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill,” he warned, adding that AI “will destroy humanities jobs.”

Karp, who himself holds humanities degrees from the elite liberal arts institutions of Haverford College and Stanford Law, will presumably be alright. With a net worth of $15.5 billion — well within the top 0.1 percent of global wealth owners — the Palantir CEO has enough money and power to live like a feudal lord (and that’s before AI even takes over.)

The rest of us, he indicates, will be stuck on the assembly line, building whatever the tech companies require.

“If you’re a vocational technician, or like, we’re building batteries for a battery company… now you’re very valuable, if not irreplaceable,” Karp insisted. “I mean, y’know, not to divert to my usual political screeds, but there will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training.”

Now, there’s nothing wrong with vocational work or manufacturing. The global economy runs on these jobs. But in a theoretical world so fundamentally transformed by AI that intellectual labor essentially ceases to exist, it’s telling that tech billionaires like Karp see the rest of humanity as their worker bees.

It seems that the AI revolution never seems to threaten those who stand to profit the most from it — just the 99.9 percent of us building their batteries.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't Ford's CEO just say they wanted highschool graduates who could do math to be automotive techs making $120K a year?

Plumbers already make ridiculous amounts of money because there aren't enough of them.

The median age in my field 5-10 years ago was 55 years old and we aren't getting an influx of new A&P licensed techs still. The main way the Aviation industry gets it's techs these days is the military and that's not even a sure fire way.

Like. CEO's doing trades when? Because he's clearly mistaken if he thinks that it's not going to be CEO's and upper management people who get their jobs replaced by AI.

They keep trying to replace engineers, software devs and so on with AI at all the tech companies and then having to back out of that decision to keep things running.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

CEOs will not be replaced any time soon, because they're all in each other companies board and they'll stand for each other (or more exactly from setting examples that could apply to them).

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

You're right. But that can only last so long.

[–] OR3X@lemmy.world 145 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (23 children)

These morons really think AI is going to allow them to replace the technical folks. The same technical folks they severely loathe because they're the ones with the skills to build the bullshit they dream up, and as such demand a higher salary. They're so fucking greedy that they are just DYING to cut these people out in order to make more profits. They have such inflated egos and so little understanding of the actual technology they really think they're just going to be able to use AI to replace technical minds going forward. We're on the precipice of a very funny "find out" moment for some of these morons.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

I think these guys forget that ai is just a program written by drumroll please HUMANS. Sure we could shitcan every programmer and replace them with "vibe coders" and skate by for a year or two but when bugs crop up and backend issues pile up AI is not gonna unfuck the mess they created and it will require human intervention. If these pricks do away with the technical folk well get to that point and suffer a technological collapse because everybody that knew how to code fled or changed careers so they could pay rent.

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

These morons really think AI is going to allow them to replace the technical folks.

This specific moron was actually talking about people with a humanities degree.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Even less plausible. There was a paper published recently arguing that by design LLMs are quite literally incapable of creativity. These predictive statistical models represent averages. They always and only generate the most banal outputs. That’s what makes them useful.

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Well, every academic field needs creativity. But it’s nothing new that people from economic or tech bubbles have a disdain for humanities.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Building incendiary devices sounds like it could become a fun and profitable handycraft...

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

Maybe they saw too many of us identifying that the biggest problem is the rich, rather than each other, so they're trying to hide behind a new manufactured enemy.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 hours ago

Hey grok, what's the most efficient, yet emotionally satisfying way to liquidate our class of parasitic, pedophilic billionaires. Extra points for style!

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.zip 40 points 15 hours ago (7 children)

Murder the elite with my bare hands? Welp guess i need to start working out.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

Can someone take this insufferable prick out back with a shotgun already?

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I’m wondering if those who think that AI will replace our jobs have ever used “AI” (LLM), because it’s not very good.

I’m currently leading a business project at a big corporation, and an AI chatbot solution got pushed into my scope by executives, to be delivered free to the client as a pilot (screwing with my budget). Either Copilot Studio is absolute garbage, or we have incompetent engineers, because they can’t get it to work for 3 weeks now.

I have a hunch that in order for the latest fancy models to vomit back barely useable answers, thousands of the world’s best engineers and PhD-s are sweating blood 24/7, while using computing power and consuming energy that would have been enough for a continent in 2019.

Meanwhile they are also burning money like crazy, with no sustainable business model in sight. I’m not saying LLMs are not to stay, but there will be a huge bust, and it will assfuck the economy and workers, while these idiots will get bailed out by Daddy Small Government.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 16 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Posting clickbait is almost as bad as writing clickbait.

We want to be informed, not have our emotions manipulated for ad revenue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

peasant hands can hold guns

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

And EMP launchers

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 hours ago

First against the wall.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Fine. Plumber $800 an hour. Want food? A carrot for $70. Our society can let the rich win and split into a working class economy where working folks charge working folks wages for goods and services.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] segabased@lemmy.zip 6 points 12 hours ago

They want slavery because ai taking jobs makes no economic sense and breaks labor theory of value. No human production means nothing has value. We are literally already seeing this with ai slop!

The humane solution is we get a society where that philosophy major actually gets to be a philosopher in a mostly post scarcity automated communist society... But that would mean these ghouls wouldn't be in power so now they're trying to tell us we need to go backwards in time to feudalism.

What an absolute fucking joke, their technology needs nationalized and given to the people, they belong in cages

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 26 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Assume for a moment that AI really was taking all of these types of jobs, which by the way, almost certainly includes CEOs. It would only be a matter of time before robots take those other jobs he's talking about.

A normal human of normal intelligence would see that and conclude that people simply wouldn't have to work anymore. And that therefore, everyone should have their basic necessities taken care of by their governments.

People would be free to do whatever they want, whether it be "humanities" work or creating things or whatever. We're no longer constrained by the fact that our lives depend on our usefulness in jobs to the ruling class.

Only a member of that ruling class would see themselves as indispensable and others as slave labor.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

The problem is ownership.

These scumbags own all the means to produce and will demand compensation for their products. The one thing I don't understand is if these fucks remove all the workers then who has money to buy their products? There isn't an infinite demand for electricians, plumbers, carpenters etc etc... so there are going to be a lot of people without the means to earn a living.

I think the ownership class is thinking of revising "let them eat cake" into "let them eat dirt. We have no need for them."

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

What a motherfucker.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Whenever any one of these assholes opens their yap in public, the only response they should hear back is, "You need us. We don't need you. Shut the fuck up."

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

Rape is never funny.... Unless it's an AI powered tentacle monster raping Alex Karp in every hole.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›