this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
1040 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

81026 readers
4579 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Discord announced on Monday that it’s rolling out age verification on its platform globally starting next month, when it will automatically set all users’ accounts to a “teen-appropriate” experience unless they demonstrate that they’re adults.

Users who aren’t verified as adults will not be able to access age-restricted servers and channels, won’t be able to speak in Discord’s livestream-like “stage” channels, and will see content filters for any content Discord detects as graphic or sensitive. They will also get warning prompts for friend requests from potentially unfamiliar users, and DMs from unfamiliar users will be automatically filtered into a separate inbox.

Direct messages and servers that are not age-restricted will continue to function normally, but users won’t be able to send messages or view content in an age-restricted server until they complete the age check process, even if it’s a server they were part of before age verification rolled out. Savannah Badalich, Discord’s global head of product policy, said in an interview with The Verge that those servers will be “obfuscated” with a black screen until the user verifies they’re an adult. Users also won’t be able to join any new age-restricted servers without verifying their age.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I haven't looked at Discord since December after getting into an argument. So perfect timing I guess.

The platform is ass anyways. Monetized features everywhere.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Discord isn’t getting my ID. Not that I am in any servers that would be affected. But concerning that if discord wanted to chill us out without hard banning our community, they could just make us age restricted

[–] OutrageousTap7014@lemmy.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PortableDoughnut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm trying to figure how to get my friends to use matrix instead of discord

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KiloGex@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Downloaded Root, exported my server. Just waiting for all my friends to transition over.

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's a centralised platform. You should move to Stoat and Matrix instead.

load more comments (2 replies)

So the general consensus amongst my various friend groups and servers I'm in is that fuck this, time to abandon ship. Was wondering what the straw would be for this service.

[–] moonburster@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Guess I'll just use steam to call my friends whilst gaming

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We use Discord in the programming courses I teach, not sure how it's going to go over with the students.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Seems like as long as your server is "teen appropriate" they won't have to verify.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Asmodeus_Krang@infosec.pub 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Never really used discord much but I'd rather use IRC anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›