this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
565 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

81026 readers
4672 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
565
Discord Alternatives, Ranked (taggart-tech.com)
submitted 1 day ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
171 comments fedilink hide all child comments
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 34 points 1 day ago

It’s very important to call out this dude either doesn’t understand what a community is or comes from this new generation that thinks docs should be on Discord and not easily accessible.

Functionality: can it do everything required of a platform for building, organizing, and sustaining a community?

Somehow Discord gets a 4 there. A chat server is a community of a kind but it will never rise the level of a platform’s community because it is, by definition, somewhat ephemeral and just a bunch of chat logs. There’s a big difference for example between IRC and bash.org for things like AzureDiamond.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago

Matrix uses a similar end-to-end cryptography scheme to Signal. "Rooms" (chats, channels) are not encrypted by default, b

I don't think that's true anymore. it has been encrypted by default for quite a few years now

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Trash guide to be fair.

Discord has more functionality than all of these, that's why it's in the position it's in today, yet it gets ranked lower than... Rocket chat??

If we're objectively finding alternatives then we need to be objective, this guide seems sus AF.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Matrix is probably the most well funded and supported open source platform that might be able to compete with Discord but even then it’s not a fair fight.

Sadly most people won’t leave discord. People will forget about this next week.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

They should use some of the funds for UX.

For gods sakes copy the Discord UI EXACTLY and replicate the backend with Matrix. That’s it.

Not whatever they’re doing now.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 113 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Top three are:

  1. Discourse
  2. Rocket.chat
  3. Matrix
[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 157 points 1 day ago (18 children)

I don't really see how someone can position Discourse as the number one Discord alternative. Surely most people looking to ditch Discord want live chat, audio/video calls, and screen sharing... Or am I just in the minority here?

For the record, I think Discourse looks awesome and even thinking about how I might use it for a project, but I do not see it as a Discord alternative.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 72 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lots of communities use discord as a replacement for a forum despite it not being fit for it at all

[–] JayGray91@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

So much so I fucking hate this phenomenon

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but that’s not an argument for replacing Discord with forums. The two serve entirely different use cases, and should be treated like two entirely separate products.

[–] gloktawasright@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn’t it though? A forum wouldn’t do all the things discord does, but the argument is that trying to use discord for a forum was a mistake in the first place. So replacing discord with a forum and then a dedicated chatting app makes sense, no?

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think we’re essentially saying the same thing in different ways. Yes, I 100% agree that forums should be separate from whatever the new Discord replacement ends up being.

I was more arguing that we can’t only use forums to replace Discord, because the realtime communication aspect would be a different use case. I’ve seen lots of “lol just use forums” types of posts, which completely ignore the realtime side of things. There would still need to be some service to replace the realtime aspects that Discord does serve.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I mean, for at least the first five letters, I can't even tell the difference.

[–] karashta@piefed.social 33 points 1 day ago

I also want this suite of things. I stream movies to friends, share games I'm playing...

These are core features to me now in a robust chat client

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Ontimp@feddit.org 3 points 19 hours ago

Rocket.chat uses Matrix though, too. It's not only Matrix but it makes use of Matrix federation among other things and they built their own Matrix server implementation in TypeScript last year

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love that Discourse is open. I hate that it's just horrendous from a usability perspective. Flarum is much better than that, in my opinion, while being way more flexible. Examples:

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/

https://orionfeedback.org/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] neblem@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Not reviewed in this eval:

  • DeltaChat (though would likely score similar to Signal with more points for decentralization)
  • IRC
  • XMPP
  • Lemmy/PieFed/Nodebb (if he's going to include Discourse..)
[–] QuadratureSurfer@piefed.social 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some other alternatives not reviewed:

  • Spacebar
  • TeamSpeak
  • Root
[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Spacebar sounded really promising when I checked them out years ago.

The big Discord.com features currently left unimplemented or with partial implementations are: Voice/Video support (WebRTC protocol support implemented, but lacking UDP protocol implementation)

Unfortunately, seems like it’s still not at a point where it could cover basic Discord functionality.

Edit: I should be clear, I’m not trying to discourage it. I really hope it succeeds to the goal of parity with Discord! Love to hear from someone who has used it a bit.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No, he hasn't been running a discord server. It's a channel. Discord is running the servers.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

God, I hated that terminology when I needed to talk with people about discord.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can only assume it's on purpose so average users really understand it wrong to avoid the associated negative view. Clever, really. But absolutely evil.

[–] izax@pawb.social 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This wasn't intended to be misleading. The term "Server" as in a Discord Server is because, be fore Discord were the days of Ventrilo and TeamSpeak. For many of us gamers used to have to run or pay for their own actual server to have that kind of functionality. Then we'd combine direct calling with Skype for small groups and video. The term made sense at the time, but hasn't held up to the test of time. Basically Discord solved a problems of having to pay for those servers, and having to use two separate programs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jcorvera@quokk.au 13 points 1 day ago

The older terminology, which is still used in the API, was a lot better.

It was Guild. It was a Discord Guild. Probably because Stanislav was working on it after he abandoned Guildwork.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

I highly doubt that when you start a “Discord server”, there’s any new machinery spun up. There is a near 100% chance it’s just an entry in a database. Nobody’s running a server just for him. So I don’t think there’s even reason to be charitable.

[–] exist@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

Users (and I think Discord too) call the communities servers, and channels are the individual topics/threads in a community. It might not make sense from a hosting perspective but people do call it that

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

If Stoat (formerly Revolt) can integrate screen sharing capabilities soon enough, they will be the closest, user-friendly experience to Discord. Even the UI is familiar, if you come from Discord.

[–] neshura@bookwyr.me 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently that's already in the backend since december, they're just getting their infrastructure up to snuff before they enable it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i notice people not mentioning team speak 6. when our discord group were planning everything team speak 6 seemed to be the winner. it’s not free, but if i am hosting it with a license and have more control over the experience, then its not that big of a deal. from what i gather team speak 6 has better faster audio, and a better screen share for gaming. but we only just started poking around at options atm.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My friend group also jumped to that first, unless it's federated though it's not going to be "like discord" enough in the long run.

Part of what makes discord so good to many is that it's one app where you can connect to various different friend groups/modding groups/artists/etc...

Matrix does allow that with its federation model, ts6 does not 🤷

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

i HATE when i have to connect to other discords for that purpose. finding information on discord is the worse of all possible outcomes. if i am running into trouble i much prefer a searchable forum. as for different friend groups, i think team speak has the ability to save multiple friend groups servers.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (4 children)

Idk what you people are smoking, forums built in search functionality was always ass.

However results showing up in search indexes were fantastic. I have a whole rant about that in another thread already. My rant: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/23704903

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nil@piefed.ca 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It seems there's also Spacebar.

https://piefed.ca/post/515452

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] weedee@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

https://s3nd.chat/

Made by the same team that did s3nd.pics (the imgur alternative. Under heavy Dev at the moment but has promise.

[–] MiahNelah@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Switching to a self-hosted good old Teamspeak 6. Their screen sharing is very good, and audio quality is far above Discord. Overall it’s still need some polish but is okay.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›