this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
845 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

81162 readers
4099 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

Audiophiles get a lot of friction, but this kind of person exists in almost any hobby. People fascinated by equipment and ascetics who loose the plot about what their hobby is all about.

[–] _NetNomad@fedia.io 15 points 6 hours ago

i personally find bananna audio the most appealing

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

So, like the $5 Trader Joe’s wine tasting with wine enthusiasts.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

What, price? There's good wine and not so good wine (and battery acid), that's it.

[–] pyr0ball@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, electrically all of those things will just attenuate amplitude, not really effect signal oscillations, which is actually what sound is ...

All they're doing is effectively adding a small resistance to the signal which will just lower the volume in effect. Adding any amplifier will fix that

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 hours ago

This is quite surprising, especially as we often don’t think of bananas, or even wet mud, as great conductors. However, the tester surmised that introducing the materials into the circuit is just like adding a resistor in series, and they’re unlikely to distort the audio too much, except by lowering the signal level.

I see you also read the article

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gigdragon@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I just want DECENT audio quality and metal construction so that it lasts and the plastic doesn't break from light wear&tear

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It was never about sound quality. Sound quality was the justification for spending money and showing off. Just like so much of consumerism.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 6 hours ago

Yep. Just like the fuckers walking around with $2500 sunglasses.

Those sunglasses don't do anything that a $20 pair can't do. And they don't even look all that different.

The important part is that they enable absolutely disgusting consumerist snobbery, allowing some very vapid people to think that they're better than other people because they have the expensive sunglasses.

In just about any kind of product you can think of, there are brands catering to this kind of conspicuous consumption.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 5 points 5 hours ago

Did the banana have gold plated contacts??

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Without a good DAC, even the cleanest input gets muddy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ignoble_stigmas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why have I bought airpods two months ago? I should’ve just stick bananas in my ears

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Charlie the unicorn was right.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I consider myself an audiophile-light. I've never been one to nit pick over minor things, but I can just tell the slightest difference between some brands.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›