this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
1280 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

81208 readers
4159 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aqua@lemmy.zip 43 points 22 hours ago

really fun fuck you google

[–] Yttra@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Huh, I wonder how this economic growth compares to Google's multiple mass layoffs over the past few years...

[–] schema@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago

Thanks for confirming we're on the right track, google.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 17 points 20 hours ago

What a preposterous argument google is making. Yes it stifles innovation having open source software and not licensing it from the soul-less mega corporation with the US government willing to break kneecaps for it (if they pay up,) that we know helps the US steal information, and themselves steals every big of information they can get their grasping hands on, both legally and illegally.

Yes Europe wouldn't have the best tools, if they weren't beholden to a mega corporation that could use the out of control drunk with power US to back up their market interests! Talk about an incredible argument. We will see, I bet europe caves to US pressure, as they did all last year, and just goes along with tech plans to bring the trojan horses of chatcontrol and age checks inside the walls of liberal democracies, to ultimately make secret social scores to determine every part of how a person is treated from business to government. Those decisions made by the worst people in the world like Palantir in cooperation with politicians.

As to keeping data in europe so the us couldn't access it, ha. What were you born yesterday? Google is beholden to the US that can make or break them in a thousand million ways. They will find a way, (they already have,) to grab all the data, stored in europe or whereever. You know it, same way we knew before snowden the feds were grabbing everything they could get their grasping hands on.

Because who is going to stop them?

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 35 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

What happened to: "Google ❤️ open source"

[–] hector@lemmy.today 13 points 19 hours ago

I think it's buried the same place they put the do no evil slogan. No body no crime as they say.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 14 points 22 hours ago

They love appropriating it, not when people use it to kick their evil asses to the curb

load more comments (1 replies)

We literally removed "don't be evil" from our mission statement, but you can totally trust us, bro.

Google

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Oh yes, bring it on!!

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago

This is good. It means that the efforts are working and Google is getting nervous. Let them get nervous and let’s give them a lot more to be nervous about.

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 12 points 19 hours ago

So, you're saying Google has selection bias?

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 123 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Drug dealer criticizes drug user's plan to quit."

[–] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The British came to China with warships when the Chinese government wanted to ban Opium. So I wouldn't expect anything else from these crapitalists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

All these craptastic US tech companies originally started on internationally developed free and open source software. They hoover up capital and talent then abuse their market power. Fuck them all.

They all run on Linux - Torvalds is a Swedish speaking Finn. Greg KH who maintains stable is German. So many libraries and core system contributions by Germans like Drepper and Poettering. Youtube ran on mysql for years from Finnish Widenius. Google built a lot of stuff with Python - from Dutch Guido van Rossum and c++ from Danish Stroustrup. All of the video and audio sites rely heavily on ffmpeg, orginally from French Fabrice Bellard. Lots of them also using virtualisation stuff which includes qemu, also from Bellard. So much comp sci research from Europe and UK. Chrome and Safari originated with KDE (German) code. Europe did all the heavy lifting while the US took all the profits. I'm not even European but every country has the same experience. They have no idea how they are viewed.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

they have no idea how they’re viewed

No, they don’t.

[–] TechnoCat@piefed.social 7 points 21 hours ago

I'd like to see Google try and run their company without open source. The operating system, programming language, databases, language libraries, network stack, etc. is such a long list of crucial things. Google is being totally nonsensical to suggest open source doesn't drive a large part of today's economy.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 18 points 21 hours ago

"Buy my shovel! Don't buy that other guys shovel!" Ah, capitalism, you crazy old whore.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection

No, this is fundamentally impossible. The US has the Cloud Act. As long as that exists, this is a nonstarter.

The US can change their laws to not have a global wiretap and secret backdoor warrant program, then this would be possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 1 day ago (7 children)

If nobody in Europe paid for Google products think of the economic benefit to Europe if all that saved cash was then spent by the people on European products and services.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 15 points 22 hours ago

Why would anyone want €100 billion in economic growth from open source investments when you can give the CIA all your data and gain access to innovative new ways to generate AI slop?

[–] privatepirate@lemmy.zip 10 points 21 hours ago

Google trying to scare Europe into giving them money and power back in their region 😥 Stfu and let Europe get their individuality and contribute to open source projects which will help Americans like me much more than any amount of money given to Google.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"It's afraid" still image from Starship Troopers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steve@communick.news 394 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (19 children)

According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Is Google seriously arguing that the money these nations save can't be added to their GDPs?
That's what it sounds like. Or am I confused?

[–] TheLastOfHisName@piefed.social 228 points 1 day ago

Google meant THEIR economic growth.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

"could harm competitiveness"

Wouldn't it be funny if they took the pool of cash they were dedicating to google, but it in half then distributed the remained to the open source initiatives they were switching to?

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago

I think it would increase competitiveness as well.

Google will actually have to innovate if they want to have people buy their products rather than just being the default one and only choice.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago

Guys, what you need to do to be competetive, to foster competition... is keep using all our products and services.

Setting up a fund to get new people involved, to get some more money to existing software devs who work on comparable products and servicrs that could be expanded and improved?

No no no, thats uh, that's anti-competetive, is what that is.

Mhm.

Yep.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You guys don’t see what they’re scared shitless about? It’s the fear of an EU-based true open source Android fork/competitor.

Also when they say FOSS will not contribute to “economic growth”, they mean Alphabet’s. Greedy pigs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] parson0@startrek.website 24 points 1 day ago

Google and their big tech buddies made their choice by supporting Trump's regime. I know actions have consequences is a concept that doesn't apply in the US, but elsewhere it does. Deal with it.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago (7 children)
  1. Shift over to open source.
  2. Invest 25--50% of what you currently pay for proprietary software into helping maintain and enhance open source software.
  3. Enjoy the economic benefits well maintained free software brings to every aspect of your digital infrastructure at no extra cost.
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] liking625@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

they are obssesed with growth and staying ultrarich instead of what it is best for everyone.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 249 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness.

Just what I'd expect a monopoly to say.

Fuck you. Alphabet.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 17 points 22 hours ago (4 children)
[–] Womble@piefed.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

But also:

image

Google is still up 100% from where it was may last year, even taking that drop into account.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 6 points 15 hours ago

maybe Google, but Microslop and Amazon;

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I've reached the point in my life where I find this more arousing than booba

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 4 points 13 hours ago

But not vagne?

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

Maybe we should short the shit out of these arseholes as they go down.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trougnouf@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They are well aware that US companies placing servers in the EU does nothing for "data sovereignty", they are bound by the Cloud Act so anything the US government demands takes precedence over the GDPR / EU regulations (which are therefore legally impossible to comply with).

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›