this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
928 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

81534 readers
4270 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eightys3v3n@lemmy.ca 23 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Fuck you Google. I won't do further updates on my Pixel and the moment I run into an issue I'll move operating systems or phones if required. Half my apps don't come from Google Play and I don't want the developers to have to register with Google for anything.

load more comments (4 replies)

Starting in September 2026, Android will require all apps to be registered by verified developers in order to be installed on certified android devices.

I wonder... I know that we used to mod our consoles due to the limits of 'certified' official software.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 55 points 17 hours ago (9 children)

If this happens, I guess it's Linux Phone time for me... I'm pretty certain GrapheneOS will be able to get around this abuse of power for a while, but it wouldn't take much effort from Google to kill them too ; they almost already have...

Or maybe dumb phone time ? But I like browsing Wikipedia and playing chess and RetroArch on my phone, I don't want to lose that just because big G$ said so...

[–] arschfidel@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 14 hours ago

The new requirements will "only" apply for "certified" Android devices. I'm pretty sure, devices running a custom ROM aren't certified, especially if you don't even have Google Services installed. Nevertheless, I'm looking forward to a bright future for Linux phones.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Fwiw, just because a dumb phone doesn't give you access to "smart" features doesn't mean the capabilities aren't present on the phone. It's just a matter of what could be hidden on the circuit board (lots can be hidden in chips), and what can be hidden in usual expected traffic (if bandwidth requirements are low, even timing of packets could be used to encode hidden data that would never show up in any logs).

Plus the simple tracking of cellphones is necessary for them to function at all.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 hours ago

its the reason why i turned off auto software updates on my phone

[–] Rennmaeuserich@feddit.org 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Guys, can't we Just use e/OS? I thougt it wouldn't be affected?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

On the one hand, google is obviously evil, and it's intentions here are undoubtedly evil as well. On the other, I do think some kind of verification of developers should exist. Just not in google hands. But who. There really isn't anyway to create an organization that could be trusted to do this. And of course, the user should be able to chose to install apps from an unverified developer.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 23 points 14 hours ago

Google has their own store, that's how they verify.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That’s how it works on Windows already. You buy a cert from a third party vendor so your setup file can pass Windows security checks and doesn’t show a big warning to the user when they open the setup file.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 41 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

Linux phones look more and more attractive

[–] Mohamad20ZX@sopuli.xyz 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Couldn’t agree more Especially when the Pine Phone Pro is improving every year since its has came out and with Posh shell and Waydroid nothing will stop Linux from succeeding in the modern era

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 25 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

sadly

The PinePhone Pro was officially discontinued in August 2025, as it didn’t sell well enough to keep production going.[7]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PinePhone_Pro

[–] hellomoto@lemmings.world 1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

My tears, maybe I can afford to eat today.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago

Fuck, I don't have the money to replace my phone. I probably wont by September either. Too many expenses.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago

So basically they wanna be Apple.

[–] eleefece@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Maybe it's time to bring back MeeGo

[–] linule@lemmy.world 111 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Time to popularize Linux phones. I read that the security model is lacking, but especially given that Android is Linux too, it shouldn’t be too difficult to catch up. The EU is also interested in tech independence, so that could be one of the sources of funding. And there are a few viable early projects, like Ubuntu Touch and Sailfish.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 2 points 10 hours ago

How about phone as terminal for home pc.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 45 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

There need to be enforced of competition law here. Companies aren't going to voluntarily support a platform with few users. Users aren't going to move to a platform without critical apps.

We live in a dystopia were you have to have the banks app to do online banking even on your desktop. You can't charge your car without an app. You can't navigate your car without a map app that has traffic information. Etc etc. I want FOSS alternatives to all these, but there isn't and Google could take even having a FOSS platform at all.

This something we need regulators to fix. It is a politically problem, not a technical one.

America screwing up trust should wake up Europe to dealing with American tech monopolies. Now it's not something just nerds and economists complain about, it is a geopolitical problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Meshuggah333@piefed.world 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Android is not Linux (the OS), it just uses the Linux kernel. That means almost nothing is transferable from one OS to the other unfortunately. 

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 30 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

How soon before Windows copies this, given they already tried this sorta lockdown with S Mode?

Also, couldn't Ubuntu hypothetically lock down the Snap store like this?

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 9 points 15 hours ago

In theory Canonical could lock down Ubuntu like that, but it would be the end of Ubuntu. Switching over to Mint or Debian is not a big deal for majority of the linux-users and also Ubuntu would lose all the advantages they can currently pull off from Debian package maintainers. Also I suppose it would bring a ton of headaches with licenses, but IANAL, so don't quote me on that. And, obviously, that would kill snapcraft too as I don't see any incentives for developers to support walled gardens for free, so it wouldn't be all bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Yliaster@thelemmy.club 36 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

How do we defend our privacy on Android now?

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 18 hours ago

Never could. Power of thousands of paid developers against a few. That's like finding all needles in a haystack, and power determines the size of that haystack and the amount of needles.

You can't use something that cost that much to make and expect to divert from what the producers intended.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 27 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Privacy isn't really in their interest. They feed off our data.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›