this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
423 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

83784 readers
2702 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senate Bill 26-051 reflects that pattern. The bill does not directly regulate individual websites that publish adult or otherwise restricted content. Instead, it shifts responsibility to operating system providers and app distribution infrastructure.

Under the bill, an operating system provider would be required to collect a user’s date of birth or age information when an account is established. The provider would then generate an age bracket signal and make that signal available to developers through an application programming interface when an app is downloaded or accessed through a covered application store.

App developers, in turn, would be required to request and use that age bracket signal.

Rather than mandating that every website perform its own age verification check, the bill attempts to embed age attestation within the operating system account layer and have that classification flow through app store ecosystems.

The measure represents the latest iteration in a series of Colorado efforts that have struggled to balance child safety, privacy, feasibility and constitutional limits.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Year of the Linux desktop inbound.

[–] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

As a parent, I wish someone would develop a cross platform, open source, parental control tool that preserves privacy while allowing for strong controls that are simple to use. The best I could come up with is a separate instance of Pihole that any device my kids use is linked to. It would be nice if there was a software option or something implemented in hardware that allowed parents to register the device with the user's age (no identifying info). Laws could then be passed forcing certain websites and apps to reject any users under a certain age. The restrictions could automatically lift when the user reaches a predetermined age. I'm not an expert so there are probably aspects of this I haven't thought through but it seems better than what has been implemented so far.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'm not in IT and only have tangential knowledge, but I would think something like corporate internet control would work for this. I know my company has blanket access restrictions with the ability to modify them on an individual basis. But I haven't the slightest idea how to implement that. I think all of my company device data goes through a tunnel.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Have you checked your modem/Wi-Fi router?

Sounds Dumb, I know, but many have them baked in.

It may not be perfect, but it covers all devices unless you can login.

[–] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I did. My router runs a version of OpenWRT and while I can blacklist certain domains, I can’t add lists of domains. They have to be added one by one. The pi-hole solution is much easier. I can add an entire list for social media. I can add a list that forces search engines to use safe search.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Safetyshaft@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Apple already has iCloud age settings

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know what ? If this law is only imposed on commercial operating systems, and I can make my free OS lie and say I'm 100+ ; then maybe this could work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I've been a longtime mobile and web developer, have a teenage kid with a phone, and am a big privacy advocate (card-carrying member of ACLU and EFF). As a parent, I don't want my kid exposed to cyber-bullying, toxic social media, or algorithmic bullshit.

And I will tell you this: the operating system is 100% where you want to do age verification.

I don't want individual social media sites, dodgy third-party orgs, or government agencies scanning our faces or IDs. Under a family sharing plan, the OS already knows how old the kid is. Any site wanting to gate access can privately ask the OS if age > X without spilling their PII. Same concept as OAuth. An opaque, encrypted token indicating GO or NO-GO.

Raging that they shouldn't do any of this is just idiotic. Unfettered access got us CSAM, kids getting radicalized, or bullied to the point of self-harm. Fuck that.

From a technical point of view, having OS-level verification is the least worst, and in my technical opinion, the best option.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›