This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
hmm....is it really "blasting" when it only mentions this in like a single line in the beginning paragraph?
Many interpreted the last article in this series as an attack on Microsoft for using the OOXML format against users’ interests. However, this was only one of my objectives, as I also wanted to raise users’ awareness of fake open-source software, such as OnlyOffice, which partners with Microsoft in a strategy to lock users in.
Need to make those click bait headlines from something. You gonna deny a hard working AI a job?
You gonna deny a hard working AI a job?
Yes please!
so that means they were SLAMMED instead
The headline doesn't match the article, but indeed onlyoffice it's not real open source.
In my language onlyoffice has several typos. Went to GitHub to submit a PR and... there are no translations to translate.
I open an issue and they tell me to send the fixes to someone by email. I send them, they are ignored and 5 years later it's still with the annoying typos.
This is a program where they pretend to be open only for marketing but they aren't actually open
Pretty noticeable that Gentoo Linux doesn't offer an option to compile OnlyOffice locally—it's only available as a -bin package, which means that it's precompiled by upstream. That tells me that either the available source is too incomplete to actually compile the software from, or it has some really strange licensing. Either way, it can't be open-source software in the accepted sense.
What a terribly misleading post title.
The post title contains literally the entire OnlyOffice-related content of the article, which is titled "Why ODF and not OOXML". Here's the first paragraph:
Many interpreted the last article in this series as an attack on Microsoft for using the OOXML format against users’ interests. However, this was only one of my objectives, as I also wanted to raise users’ awareness of fake open-source software, such as OnlyOffice, which partners with Microsoft in a strategy to lock users in.
Everything after this is about closed vs open standards.
darn, 2 minutes too late. made a similar comment.
I've had a relatively good experience with OnlyOffice, although it has some issues.
Personally I don't see interoperability as an anti-open issue, but I can appreciate the stance. I think I have to investigate to understand how the Microsoft format diverges from the open standard for office XML files, or in what way the format remains proprietary. I had been under the impression that OnlyOffice follows the open standard.
OnlyOffice does ape Microsoft Office in a lot of ways but I see that as a positive. Users are far more likely in my opinion to switch to something that looks and feels familiar.
LibreOffice is hard to use. The menus and shortcuts are not well organized and the entire suite feels like a relic from the early 2000s. If they invested in a modern UI with less friction for users who are looking for MS alternatives, they wouldn't be facing competition from projects like OnlyOffice. If they invested in feature parity for mobile users, they wouldn't be losing potential users to those who offer it.
They have an incredibly powerful backend with far more capability than the more junior OnlyOffice. Yet they fail to recognize why that just doesn't matter to the majority of users. Most users just want to quickly author and edit files, share them with other users, and get on with the next task. LibreOffice has become overly fixated on niche features and optimizations that are very cool from a technical standpoint but are totally out of touch.
By the way, LibreOffice also supports OOXML, so... do with that what you want.
You're the first account I've seen endorse OpenOffice, and I've been casually looking for a better alternative to word since the copilot bullshit last year.
Do you have a good example of something they added since LibreOffice forked off that's worth considering if choosing an alternative?
I totally agree with LibreOffice team!
