this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
1487 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

81869 readers
4738 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta last night filed a request for a preliminary injunction in California’s existing case against Amazon for price fixing. Attorney General Bonta’s 2022 lawsuit alleged that the company stifled competition and caused increased prices across California through its anticompetitive policies in order to avoid competing on price with other retailers. New evidence paints a clearer and more shocking picture. The motion for a preliminary injunction comes after a robust discovery process where California uncovered evidence of countless interactions in which Amazon, vendors, and Amazon’s competitors agree to increase and fix the prices of products on other retail websites to bolster Amazon’s profits. Time and again, across years and product categories, Amazon has reached out to its vendors and instructed them to increase retail prices on competitors’ websites, threatening dire consequences if vendors do not comply. Vendors, bullied by Amazon’s overwhelming bargaining leverage and fearing punishment, comply — agreeing to raise prices on competitors’ websites (often with the awareness and cooperation of the competing retailer), or to remove products from competing websites altogether. Amazon’s goal is to insulate itself from price competition by preventing lower retail prices in the market at the expense of American consumers who are already struggling with a crisis of affordability.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Surp@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And nothing will be done about it probably

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Carry on California. I need to cutdown and eventually stop purchasing from Amazon.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Until there is serious punishment for corporations nothing ever changes with the amount of abuse they can do.

[–] abilol@feddit.cl 5 points 19 hours ago

Capitalism at it's most advantageous to humanity.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

When you have a government of criminals, it emboldens those not in government

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Amazon has reached out to its vendors and instructed them to increase retail prices on competitors’ websites

This is and has been part of Amazon's contract to be listed on their site since the beginning. They are not even remotely the only one doing this. It's an industry norm in digital storefronts. Valve has also been sued for this several times. I don't know why we're acting like this is a recent discovery.

We need to just ban this practice, because as long as they're allowed to, they will.

[–] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Valve states you can’t sell a steam key in another platform for cheaper than in steam, not that you can’t sell your game anywhere else at a lower price. That’s slightly different than here. Not defending it just saying that it is actually different than here.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is OK because our Leaders are Looking out For the COMMON man! That's why I'm going to ENTHUSIASTICALLY Vote for the Billionaire AGAIN!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›