this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
426 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

81907 readers
4954 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Civilization Gandhi, is that you?

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They forgot to make their LLMs play thousands of games of tic-tac-toe first.

[–] RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would just make the LLM homicidally bored and want to kill everyone more.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

In WarGames the computer plays tic tac toe against itself until it realizes it’s a solved game and there is no way to win.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Mathew Broderick lied to me.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

How do you think Ferris Bueller pulls off all those stunts?

That's the kid from war games in witness protection. They look identical, they're both grade hackers ffs....

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Oh cool, AI will actually be the end of the world, not because it's actually sentient but because some meathead who can't tell the difference pushes the button. That's fucking great.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Three posts away in my feed, a thread about the Pentagon demanding the AI provider for the military to remove safeguards.

https://lemmy.world/post/43565531

SHALL WE PLAY A GAME?

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sargent McArthur eat your heart out.

For context he wanted to send 10 nukes to make a line between Taiwan and china

AI is too nuke happy.

Also gotta add the infamous Computer Fraud and Abuse act 1986 was made because of the film war games.

A high ranking offical watched war games then asked the Secretary of defense could that happen?

And the official replied yes technically.

Enter the most vague ordinance!

Do you use adblock?

CFABA violated

The shit is so vague.

I highly recommend the phreaking episode of darknet diary's.

[–] dandylion@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

AI is what happy? AI is behaving the way it's designed.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Leeroy Jenkins has doomed us all.

At least I got chicken

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

De-bullshitting that headline:

~~AIs~~ Programmers can’t stop their programs recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulations

And yeah that's what happens inside a genocidal empire where "R&D" is strictly funded by the MIC.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Programmers can't stop morons mistaking a glorified autocorrect program for a decision making device.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 20 hours ago

Models aren't programs.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I have wonderful dreams of walking through AI data centers destroying everthing. I really enjoy those, but in this one tiny case, can we blame the AI? The US deserves it.

[–] Daxelman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I too am tired of the United States playing too many stupid games and not winning enough stupid prizes.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure the "prize" is a government of pedos.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe but sure as hell the rest of the world doesn't.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

More than fair. I should remember that my perspective is completely effed before I make jokes like that one.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 1 day ago

To be honest, I would recommend the same thing.

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone who has played video games, especially where there is a somewhat steep learning curve or some element of past choices carrying forward thru the game, has had the moment where they realize it might be time to start fresh with the info I've acquired. It's not a shock to me that these AI entertain the nuclear option so often.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

there is no ai, only largelanguagemodel that has been trained on data. The data it has been trained suggests this is the best idea. llm cant evaluate the data its trained on so anything you put in will be equally valid. I give it that its really impressive how they can output the training results in such coherent way that can be kind of "conversed" with, but there is no will or intelligence behind it.

This is also why corporations insisting on putting them everywhere is quite horrible security issue -> you can jailbreak any llm and tell them to do anything. So this has enabled all kinds of stupid vulnerabilities that exploit this. Now you can even send someone malicious google calendar invites that makes gemini do bad shit to your systems its connected to.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

So you're saying that because the AI has been exposed to training data in the past, it's incapable of making choices. Interesting argument. Pretty easy to reducto ad absurdum, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›