this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
19 points (95.2% liked)

Australian Politics

1771 readers
17 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The treasurer, Jim Chalmers, confirmed that changes were being examined in the lead-up to the May federal budget after reports his department was modelling rules that would limit negative gearing to two investment properties.

That's one too many imo but still even this would be good to see

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

Anything is better than the current environment, I’d honestly like to just see us get something on the books to try and control property speculation.

We can always continue to improve and fine-tune as we go - shouldn’t let perfect be the enemy of good

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Classic Labor. "Here's a good idea, we're gonna do something half as good!"

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

negative gearing should only apply to new builds AND be constrained to expense against the buildings income itself.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

And there should be a limit on the number of houses you can do it for. In your entire life.