this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
551 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

82131 readers
4962 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 23 points 17 hours ago

Why lawmakers are so stupid at understanding technology

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 42 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

Did you guys know I was born January 1st 1901?

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 20 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

I was born in January 1st 1970, more credible and symbolic.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

the unix zero can blow up sloppy code too. but not often. one of few dates i can remember.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Shockingly, 2000-01-01 suffices.

Or to put it more bone crumblingly:
There's no need to go back into the last millennium.

[–] clif@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

"the 1900s"

: /

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 5 points 16 hours ago

I thought we were born April 20th, 1969

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 33 points 20 hours ago

No way this is enforceable

[–] TheKaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 17 hours ago

Saw someone say this on the last article I saw regarding this, but:

What's stopping the OSes from just putting "Not for use in California" on their product/website? Seems like a simple and easy fix lol.

[–] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 21 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

Luckily this dogshit is completely unenforceable. It doesn't excuse the people who introduced this law, of course.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

I love the definitions section... So, first it defines the 4 age brackets a user can be: Under 13, 13-16, 16-18, or over 18. Then they define "Child" as anyone under 18. Then, and this is where it gets good, they define a "User" as a "Child". So by these definitions, no one can be considered a user if they are over 18. (which, then, why is there an "over 18" age bracket defined earlier??)

Not only do these people not seem to understand technology, they also don't understand that people over 18 use technology, or maybe exist?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

It's hard enough trying to get Linux adoption in schools and businesses. This law makes it an additional liability.

Administrators of FOSS systems will be considered OS Providers under this law, and will be liable at $2000 to $7500 for every child they expose to a non-compliant OS.

Those few schools that have adopted Linux will be forced to switch to M$ and Google products.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 6 points 18 hours ago

This is just another charge to add when someone is accused of a crime involving computers. It doesn't have to be a computer related crime but just be part of their property.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 88 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

Despite signing it, Newsom issued a statement urging the legislature to amend the law before its effective date, citing concerns from streaming services and game developers about "complexities such as multi-user accounts shared by a family member and user profiles utilized across multiple devices."

Then why the fuck did you sign it if it wasn't ready and needed amendments? Is this what you're going to do as president too?

Rhetorical, of course. Note how he doesn't say he disagrees with the bill, just that it needed to consider family devices.

If this is who wins the primary, we are done. We're basically already done, for sure, but him winning the primary would be the final nail in the coffin.

[–] Sundiata@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

because he is a conservative dumbfucking cunt.

judge: the jury finds the defendant guilty of 9 counts of child negligence, and will serve 5 months in prison with a fine of $10,000 in damages.

prisoner: what you here for? what did you do?

father: I allowed my child to create his own account on Debian Trixie 13.3 with KDE Plasma interface.

prisoner: chuckles

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aReallyCrunchyLeaf@lemmy.ml 207 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So now when I spin up a VM at my sysadmin job I have to tell the server I'm an adult? Does anyone actually know what the fuck we are doing here? What an absolute clown show.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 140 points 1 day ago (7 children)

This is what happens when boomers never die and stay in office for a lifetime. They don’t understand technology but are allowed to make the laws that govern their use.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 48 points 22 hours ago

Nha boomers are not the cause for this shit. Smart ass marketeers and tech bro pushing for more precise target identification and thus more reach for them are to blame. And those I stumble upon are definitely on the younger side.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Does anyone actually know what the fuck we are doing here?

Obviously not, no.

You're a sysadmin... you should know this.

You're the person who has to actually think through the results of other people's decisions.

That's your job, lol.

Other people get paid to make decisions, not think about them.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is religious repression of TempleOS

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age

That part is good at least. It also makes the California law an exercise in wasting everyone's time and money.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The law was designed this way specifically so that people won’t fight it as hard because it doesn’t provide any verification requirements. That bill would come later once the outrage over this has waned and the age gating becomes normalized in the local culture so that people just shrug off the verification requirement in the future.

They’re not wasting any time or money, they're just playing the long game.

[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 35 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Are children not allowed to use computers now?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 239 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Simple solution. From now on Linux distros should ship with a big message "NOT FOR USE IN CALIFORNIA".

You want to force age verification? No server in all of California will run. Period.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

California users practice penmanship in preparation to expected return to paper and pen.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 101 points 1 day ago (9 children)

How will this affect embedded os like freertos or vxworks? There are lightbulbs that have operating systems these days, am I going to have to show ID to turn on my light?

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago

My guess would be these OS's just wont do it and stop doing business in that state.

Lucky for you, you can just download them anyway.

My guess is also that these lawmakers dont care nor considered other OS's than Windows, MacOS, iOS and Android.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth 90 points 1 day ago (5 children)

uhhh. So would I need to get everyone who uses the household pc to verify age? Whats stopping a child from using the family pc that was age verified by an adult?

[–] loie@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Believe it or not, straight to jail

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›