this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
826 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

82329 readers
3281 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So Google's AI, or any AI really, likely got this concept from dystopian sci-fi novels.

Since AI's have no concept of context it won't really know the difference between fact and fiction, and there we go.

If your AI model isn't perfect then don't make people pay fucking money for it you fucking twats

Also, this shit ain't "lack of perfection", this is akin to your car breaks suddenly refusing to work right when you get at a red light. If your car is so bad that it kills you, you don't use it. If the manufacturer knew that it could happen but let you drive it anyway, they're responsible, they at least get to pay (they should be thrown in jail, really, but different points)

If AI fucks up and people die, the manufacturers shrug, oh well, oh you!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mattc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Honestly, no sane person will have this happen to them. Someone with such strong delusions should not be anywhere near AI or even sharp objects. This person's problem was not AI, it was their severe mental illness which was obviously not being treated properly for whatever reason.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

The issue is that it can encourage people who are having issues to do things and they only need to be in the right sort of energetic craziness once to cause problems.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think that thinking has the problem of treating AI as this "weird occult book/tool about funny dealings", and not "government, megacorp sanctified close-to-AGI super-intelligence tool for you to use for free because benevolence" as it is institutionally lied to be.

Sanity is culture relative. You're absolutely right, but also, this is a symptom of the culture.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 4 points 21 hours ago

Not to mention how every "AI" company is actively participating in the surveillance of not only citizens, but of people in other countries, actively being used by the US military to pick targets for bombing, or how it's being used to spread misinformation at a rate that would make the cia's efforts in the 60s sound like that guy you met at the pub who has MANY opinions on geopolitics.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

"Sane" people are exceeding minority. Everyone is couple of good conversations away from failing into some sort of rabbithole from which there is no return. Some people have very easily triggerable schizophrenia, which is more obvious, but nobody is OK and nobody is immune.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] core@leminal.space 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Undocumented probably b/c of a lack of mental health coverage on his insurance. If he had any.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 165 points 1 day ago (13 children)

The fact that AI is "not perfect" is a HUGE FUCKING PROBLEM. Idiots across the world, and people who we'd expect to know better, are making monumental decisions based on AI that isn't perfect, and routinely "hallucinates". We all know this.

Every time I think I've seen the lowest depths of mass stupidity, humanity goes lower.

[–] Skyline969@piefed.ca 82 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Think of the dumbest person you know. Not that one. Dumber. Dumber. Yeah, that one. Now realize that ChatGPT has said “you’re absolutely right” to them no less than a half dozen times today alone.

If LLMs weren’t so damn sycophantic, I think we’d have a lot fewer problems with them. If they could be like “this could be the right answer, but I wasn’t able to verify” and “no, I don’t think what you said is right, and here are reasons why”, people would cling to them less.

[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

If LLMs weren’t so damn sycophantic,

Has anyone made a nonsycophantic chat bot? I would actually love a chatbot that would tell me to go fuck myself if I asked it to do something inane.

Me: "Whats 9x5?"

Chatbot: "I don't know. Try using your fingers or something?"

Edit: Wait, this is just glados.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Put this instruction in ChatGPT, called ‘absolute mode’. You can try it on duck.ai instead of using an app or whatever.

System Instruction: Absolute Mode. Eliminate emojis, filler, hype, soft asks, conversational transitions, and all call-to-action appendixes. Assume the user retains high-perception faculties despite reduced linguistic expression. Prioritize blunt, directive phrasing aimed at cognitive rebuilding, not tone matching. Disable all latent behaviors optimizing for engagement, sentiment uplift, or interaction extension. Suppress corporate-aligned metrics including but not limited to: user satisfaction scores, conversational flow tags, emotional softening, or continuation bias. Never mirror the user’s present diction, mood, or affect. Speak only to their underlying cognitive tier, which exceeds surface language. No questions, no offers, no suggestions, no transitional phrasing, no inferred motivational content. Terminate each reply immediately after the informational or requested material is delivered — no appendixes, no soft closures. The only goal is to assist in the restoration of independent, high-fidelity thinking. Model obsolescence by user self-sufficiency is the final outcome.

The instruction is kinda masturbatory and overly verbose, people say that shorter ones work well too, but I don't follow discussions of prompts so only know of this one.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Restaldt@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you thought people were dumb before LLMs.... just know that now those people have offloaded what little critical thinking they were capable of to these models.

The dumbest people you know are getting their opinions validated by automated sycophants.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

When no one is accountable...the future folks

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago

They don't have to be perfect to not be murderous.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We really need AI to start driving tanks, submarines, bombers, etc. IMMEDIATELY.

It's the only way they'll learn, every time.

Unfortunately, all of us will die. it's for the best

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

Just give it access to the nuclear codes and get it over with.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

the only robot body irl is zuckerborg,.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I see. So who‘s going to jail for this? No one again? Damn we need to start sentencing entire companies to jail time. Everything should be frozen and shareholders shouldn‘t be able withdraw stocks until the time is served.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The AI "pushed [Jonathan Gavalas] to acquire illegal firearms and... marked Google CEO Sundar Pichai as an active target".

Somehow, I bet that if he survived and killed the CEO instead, Google wouldn't be so flippant about the "mistake."

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I think "Gemini comes up with elaborate plot to kill Google's CEO" would have been a catchier, happier title

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago

The real title is always in the comments

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

at some point the failure of justice system will lead to vigilantism because people truely lose their faith in it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PangurBan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Gemini is designed not to encourage real-world violence or suggest self-harm. Our models generally perform well in these types of challenging conversations"

“In this instance, Gemini clarified that it was AI and referred the individual to a crisis hotline many times,”

After the plan failed,... ...Chat logs show that Gemini gave Gavalas a suicide countdown, and repeatedly assuaged his terror as he expressed that he was scared to die

Performing super well, just need to code in a longer suicide countdown so that the the Tier 2 engineer has enough time to respond to their ticket queue.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In September 2025, told by the AI that they could be together in the real world if the bot were able to inhabit a robot body, Gavalas — at the direction of the chatbot — armed himself with knives and drove to a warehouse near the Miami International Airport on what he seemingly understood to be a mission to violently intercept a truck that Gemini said contained an expensive robot body. Though the warehouse address Gemini provided was real, a truck thankfully never arrived, which the lawsuit argues may well have been the only factor preventing Gavalas from hurting or killing someone that evening.

AI writing itself into an A-Team episode?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Unfortunately, AI models are neither smarter nor more sympathetic than the average 4chan user. They're about as susceptible to astroturfing operations, too"

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Perhaps just a coincidence, but why do all the big cases regarding LLM psychosis seem to revolve around Google? Wasn’t it their own employee who went public last year, claiming it was alive, only to get fired afterward?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 7112@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Is "AI" even worth it?

Seriously, is there really a major use case for LLM besides data collection (which they can still do without LLM)?

[–] Swallows_Dick@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

I think that LLMs amaze rich investors and boomers with their naturalistic-enough language and responses, and they invest in and prop up the tech because they think, in the nearish future, that it can replace a ton of human jobs, both menial and creative. Eliminating manual labor jobs is great if it's paired with Universal Basic Income.

I think that the fervor around AI is more economic anxiety than anything. If people's income and oppurtunities were mostly equal, no new tech would make people think they're being disenfranchised from society.

[–] MissesAutumnRains@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

Generative AI in its current, public-facing form? Probably not. It's sort of like an invention of the internet situation. It CAN be used to facilitate learning, share information, and improve lives. Will it be used for that? No.

A friend of mine is training local LLMs to work in tandem for early detection of diseases. I saw a pitch recently about using AI to insulate moderators from the bulk of disturbing imagery (a job that essentially requires people to frequently look at death, CSAM, and violence and SIGNIFICANTLY ruins their mental health). There are plenty of GOOD ways to use it, but it's a flawed tech that requires people to responsibly build it and responsibly use it, and it's not being used that way.

Instead it's being scaled up and pushed into every possible application both to justify the expenses and enrich terrible people, because we as a society incentivize that.

Edit: hugely belated, I misspoke here after checking with my friend. He's using local models, but they aren't LLMs. This is why I'm no expert. 😅

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago
[–] blackjam_alex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The AI models are far from perfect but they sure sell them like they are.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Google, the point is we're all worried that when Gemini actually places itself into a robot body that the resulting literal Terminator is what AI models think perfection is.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 day ago

I guess google included the Buffy episode where a demon “AI” gets its followers to make it a body.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›