this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
795 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

84143 readers
2251 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a sensational turn of events in the fight against Chat Control, a majority in the European Parliament voted today to end the untargeted mass scanning of private communications. In doing so, the Parliament firmly rejected the error-prone and unconstitutional surveillance practices of recent years. Pressure is now mounting on EU governments to respect the MEPs’ vote and bury untargeted mass surveillance in Europe once and for all.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bonenode@piefed.social 187 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Once and for all... until the next vote?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 91 points 1 month ago

Everything is temporary.

Political participation is a full-time job, keep the pressure on and the change will endure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 140 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What is this? Good news? In this economy? It simply cannot be!

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago

This is democracy manifest!

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Euroooopeeeee!!!

(Well the EU but it sounds less cool).

[–] VoiHyvaLuojaMitaNyt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

EUUU! (said like a new jersey mafioso says "eyyy")

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago

Finally some good fucking news. Now let's make it so there's no 2.0 3.0 etc constantly trying to sneak this in - we need to enshrine privacy into real laws.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yay Europe! Genuinely happy for you folks.

Maybe someday we’ll have freedom and privacy in the US :’)

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 month ago

Halt! You have gone below the mandatory threshold for nationally mandated jingoism. An ICE unit has been dispatched to your location to bring you to the RFK Right-To-Labour camp.

The beating will continue until moral improves.

[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's definitely starting to feel like having your rights enshrined on unalterable tablets of stone, but which must be re-interpreted by a half dozen political appointees holding a seance with the founding fathers every few months, may not be the platonic ideal of governance that Americans are constantly telling the world it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BladeFederation@piefed.social 59 points 1 month ago
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Awesome

Can we now put that in some form of European constitution, pretty please with a cherry?

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

Or we put it on a timer and let it bubble up in some months to reevaluate it over and over again. Wouldn't that be fun?

🫩

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wonder what all these anti-EU russian propaganda bots are going to use now to sow discontent against the EU... lol

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was a genuine concern, I am happy with the result

[–] iglou@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Of course. Nothing is black and white. This was a real issue, but still abused by anti-EU propaganda to weaken us.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Yes, but Denmark gave the opportunity to do so. We know we have enemies that wnt us divided, why bring such a stupid and controversial piece of legislation forward.

There should be blame put at their door for this, we know the trolls will troll that isnt new.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably pointing out the imperialism. It’s important to listen to your critics because there can be kernels of truth amongst the bullshit.

[–] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

russians pointing out imperialism... how ironic

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Nobody said they had to be morally integer...

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

.ml users crying in their commie blocks

[–] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 month ago

Why is it possible to vote for something that is against the constitution?

[–] Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yay for the EU! Hopefully you guys get a law that will permanently enshrine your privacy rights (or rights to encrypted chats at least).

[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

GDPR already exists, but there is no such thing as permanence in politics. Constant struggle

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And there have been talks to weaken GDPR to appease Americans. So no rights are never permanent

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as permanent laws. And for good reasons.

I mean, yeah, I didn't necessarily mean forever. And you're right. But I hope you get some sort of law that is actually enforceable and has a chance of being useful for as long as it lives to defend you right to privacy.

[–] lb_o@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Good News! I was so afraid for our future in Europe.

Losing freedoms in our modern times will lead to just another authoritarian state, which will eventually lead to shit.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Shit, I've heard so much gear mongoring about this for so long. Also on here.

The EU's stance have never been anything other than no chat control. All everyone else have pointed out are proposals not even reaching the votes, or got voted down.

I get that you are afraid that the EU would do it anyway and pass the proposals. But they never did, and even if it got voted for today, it's not even final and needs to go to the council who is openly against it.

But so nice that this is FINALLY put down.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 37 points 1 month ago

It's always better to be worried for nothing than not worried for something you didn't pay enough attention to. Even if something fascist has no chance of passing, you should still resist it as loudly and as aggressively as possible, every single time.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Glad to know. I'd rather be overly cautious than overly careless about privacy, tho (looks across the Atlantic)

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

This is a really naive take - this amendment (which requires message scanning to be targeted) passed with a slim majority and could well have failed. In that case the existing mass surveillance ("voluntary scanning") would probably keep happening at least until 2028.

The council meanwhile is overwhelmingly pro-message-scanning, and they (together with the commission) are the ones who are pushing to break e2e encryption. There will now be talks between the three institutions to decide on how to proceed. Sadly I expect that some "compromise" will be reached eventually.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Says the guy overlooking the other trojan horse of age controls being brought inside the walls. Your analysis is not so good.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ISOmorph@feddit.org 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In doing so, the Parliament firmly rejected the error-prone and unconstitutional surveillance practices of recent years.

Good news. However shouldn't that also include online age verification?

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

No, those things can be done in a completely private way.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 21 points 1 month ago

The war over civil rights is continuing, no questions but this has been an important vote against the surveillance state ambitions.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 15 points 1 month ago

Hell yeah! Great to hear that

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Now Denmark, don't you fucking dare doing this again!

[–] PokerChips@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago

They've probably realized that American corporations which are ran by the Epstein class get to sift through all the data

[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Great news!

[–] me_myself_and_I@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

*Officially

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Europe has pressure to shift the narrative from all systems and institutes have been a part of the parasite class goals, to these concessions. "Noo don't collapse us, we are less rigged". But rigged is still rigged

load more comments
view more: next ›