this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
679 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

83094 readers
3139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think there was a lot of research into where these things come from to begin with.

What a surprise.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Figures, make it difficult and expensive for consumers to get routers. Make it so people must pay 5 times as much for a lower quality "US made" router in 4-5 years once the factories are built; or people just stop using the internet at home like the administration wants.

The US does not make many electronics, and when we do, they are ALWAYS made with imported components. So this is once again a threat to companies to move production to the US, but with ZERO incentive for the companies to do so.

No wonder our economy is tanking so hard under these nazi's. They are so incompetent, it hurts.

[–] aport@programming.dev 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What the fuck are they doing?

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Taking a huge payment from Comcast and Verizon would be my guess. The language appears to exclude ISP-owned routers.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

It's the implementation part of ending net neutrality, the legal framework was put in during Trump's last administration. Goal is to make your home network entirely managed and visible to your ISP, who has huge incentives (financial and otherwise) to comply with government requests for information and censorship.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago

Spying on citizens at best. Manipulating content at worst.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Quick question. What would happen if China decided to get angry about this, and stop selling 100% of their goods to American companies unless they allowed 100% of their goods to be sold without restrictions?

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] tyler@programming.dev 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh so nothing would change then. Good to know.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

So everything

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] metakrakalaka@lemmychan.org 11 points 3 days ago

Get them pitchforks ready.

And guillotines.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 11 points 3 days ago

I’m thinking exempt based on the FCC language of “designed to be installed by the consumer”. ISP provided routers are usually hooked up by the installer tech. Which makes me wonder which ISP chortled orange man’s balls to get this passed.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›