this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
1225 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

83220 readers
3489 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

If we can keep getting these assholes in front of juries, maybe something will change.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

So why do managers who ignore staff warnings always get off Scott free?

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago

Any links to Epstein are entirely irrelevant.....

I predict this will be tied up in appeals until the day SCOTUS or the executive sniff these suits out.

[–] darklamer@feddit.org 10 points 6 days ago

So they want us to believe that the company that knowingly profited from genocide in Myanmar also knowingly profited from child exploitation? Really? OK then, I can believe that.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

He's got those Trumpian reverse raccoon eyes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brem@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Go figure, a company that exploits habits is found guilty of exploiting children....

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

look, if the children didn't want to become victims then why did they make themselves so sexy

-- Meta defense (probably)

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 7 points 6 days ago

People just need to get off these platforms. Enless I can just pop off I don't want what you got and these techno turdz can eat my arse. Facebook needs to die along with roblox

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The details of evasion tactics they used where even harder to read. How fucking irresponsible and outright fucked up do you have to be to OK this shit. Wow.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

The robot is tired.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

The normal appeal and out of court settlement. The f'n lawyers always win.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 6 days ago

“We respectfully disagree with the verdict and will appeal. We work hard to keep people safe on our platforms and are clear about the challenges of identifying and removing bad actors or harmful content,” said a Meta spokesperson. “We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously, and we remain confident in our record of protecting teens online.” Internal Meta documents and testimony obtained by the New Mexico department of justice during the litigation revealed that both company employees and external child safety experts repeatedly warned about risks and harmful conditions on Meta’s platforms. Evidence presented to the jury included details of the 2024 arrest of three men charged with sexually preying on children through Meta’s platforms, and attempting to meet up with them. This was part of a sting investigation operated by undercover agents and dubbed “Operation MetaPhile” by the attorney general’s office.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›