this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
426 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

83069 readers
3865 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 58 minutes ago

Billionaires don't give a fuck about anyone but themselves, not even their kids. And, we've all agreed to let billionaires run the world, it seems.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago) (1 children)

Elon Musk is such a goddamned literal supervillain that he managed to make the theme of Firefly wrong.

Apparently, they can take the sky from you.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 18 minutes ago

Ads on the fucking moon are going to do it for me.

[–] MuteDog@lemmy.world 16 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They might put a million satellites into orbit, but they're certainly not going to be orbital data centers. At least not as we currently understand data centers. The idea that space is cold and therefore a great place to put data centers that get hot is the idea of a stoned moron talking out of their ass. Space is a vacuum, you know what else is a vacuum, the part of your portable coffee mug that keeps your beverage warm or cold for ages, because vacuum is a crazy good insulator. Just because space is cold doesn't mean the heat from an orbital data center can dissipate into it. This dumb idea is never going to happen unless data canter technology improves to the point where they aren't environmental disasters anymore.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 55 minutes ago

It's either data centres in space or giant mirrors to reflect sunlight.

Presumably his engineers have explained this to him but he didn't listen

[–] vane@lemmy.world 28 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TransNeko@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Welcome to SpaceX where we provide a garenteed night sky view that is simply to die for. Subscribe now to enjoy your favorite night sky. Subscribe now for a lower price than normal. Remember, Subscription to SpaceX's night sky is mandated by USA law. Those who don't subscribe will be executed as Traitors and Terrorists. SpaceX's Night Sky experience normally costs $399 per day but if you subscribe in the next 30 seconds using the following code (insert code here) you can enjoy SpaceX's Night Sky for just $99.99 a day. subscribe now. Terms and conditions apply. SpaceX is not responsible for any propery damage, injuries, and/or deaths related to SpaceX satellites falling from orbit. Prices scale based on your race and gender with White men receiving a 100% discount.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 2 hours ago

He never respected his fellow man, why start now?

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 8 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

There are roughly 15,000 total at the moment ? I wonder what that will do to animals and insects lives.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 18 minutes ago

exactly nothing as most animals and insects can't even see the stars; their sense of vision isn't good enough for that.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

is already so bad. i do astro timelapses and it's all you see anymore. they stand out so much now, if the quantity gets 100x'd it'll be a nightmare.

it will blot out the stars...

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There aren’t many animals or insects in low-earth orbit though, thankfully.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah but they use the light to navigate too. They use this planet too.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 54 minutes ago

I think local illumination is probably going to be more of a problem than reflected light of a satellite.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 13 points 3 hours ago
[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

everything the tech bros touch, dies

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 7 points 2 hours ago

Down with the space clankers

[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 20 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well that wannabe nazi took everything else, so why not the sky?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I thought they couldn't take the sky from me!

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We haven't even finished burning the sky and boiling the sea!

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

And serenity is nowhere to be found.

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 62 points 6 hours ago (8 children)

LEO satellites decay very quickly every one of them will burn up in the atmosphere within 10 years. They need to be replaced constantly. As soon as spacex goes out of business these will all fall out of the sky.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't count on it. These things don't just zip along in their orbits. LEO is crowded. They have to maneuver to avoid collisions... a lot.

Over the past six months, Starlink satellites have been increasingly performing collision avoidance maneuvers. According to a report filed by SpaceX with the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC), SpaceX broadband satellites were forced to avoid more than 25 thousand times from December 1, 2022 to May 31, 2023. And since their launch in 2019, the total number of maneuvers has reached 50 thousand.

If Starlink or any other mega-constellation company loses control of their satellites for any reason, there could be collisions. A recent study (Note: PDF) suggests that a sufficiently powerful CME could cause a runaway Kessler Syndrome in as little as 2.8 days if the loss of control lasts that long.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

I mean with proper regulation or would be slightly better. If they can maneuver to avoid collisions they can likes deorbit themselves at a quicker pace.

The main issue is if ever they went under someone would buy it, or try to buy it, at a discount. So they likely wouldn't go away even if Star link went under.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Polluting atmosphere doing so.

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 17 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That’s fair but unfortunately nothing compared to the pollution from launching them

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Which is also nothing compared to a slew of other pollution sources

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 30 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Any way to help them do that?

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago (15 children)

No way that’s cheaper or easier than waiting

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 hours ago

At least not legally

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 107 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's so infuriating... I occasionally do astrophotography and it's getting to the point where any long exposure just has satellite streaks everywhere... Fuck Musk.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 41 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I remember just 10 years ago using a special app on my phone to alert me of any potential satellite flares so I could run out and catch them.

Now I can't look at the night sky for 2 minutes without seeing one.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

You can actually see some in broad daylight. I was shocked one day looking up and seeing one (white dot in the picture, verified with sat tracking app).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 73 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

LEO satellite internet service is life changing for people who live in underserviced, rural, and remote areas - but it’s a tragedy that it’s controlled by billionaires and the USA. Growth at all costs mindset cannot accept that they should exist only as an ISP of last resort, so they’re servicing urban areas and planning data centres.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 25 points 4 hours ago

It would be better to support public fiber infrastructure (through PUDs) in almost every way. I know not all remote areas can be reached with fiber, but most rural areas can be. My county has done exactly that with the rural portions - they focused on rolling it out to underserved rural areas first (even though it was more expensive to do that up front). Now, those rural areas have gigabit fiber and they didn't have to pay tens of thousands to wire it up to their homes.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Who needs to track asteroids when everyone can have NzI-Link internet?

load more comments
view more: next ›