this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
384 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

83449 readers
3433 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 hour ago

For entertainment in Excel...

[–] InfiniteHench@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Surprise twist: I don’t and won’t rely on it for jack shit

[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

Ah yes copilot in the app everybody thinks of for entertainment…notepad.

[–] falynns@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Ah, the famous "Fox News" defense of claiming you're an entertainment medium but you should totally trust it.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

That's complete and utter bullshit. Either stand behind your product or don't ship it universally. Pick a lane. Either is worth using it or isn't.

This wishy washy bullshit paints a picture of an embarrassingly inept organization, is that really what you're going for Microsoft?

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

Then how come my company just roll this shit out for work? Allstate just walk us through how us co pilot to type our emails. And to use it for note taking.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 22 minutes ago (1 children)

Because in the end, you, the person that is forced to use various AI chatbot/agent/model/whatever, will be held responsible for anything that happens after one of the 3000 decisions they imposed you to make with no way to check everything turns out to cause the slightest problem. When that happens, YOU were supposed to know that NOTHING the AI tells/says/do is to be expected correct, so it's your responsibility if something's gone wrong.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 20 minutes ago

Already told them I refuse to let AI write my emails or make my notes. Fuck that noise.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 35 points 3 hours ago

If it works, it's thanks to us. If it doesn't, it's your fault.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 16 points 3 hours ago

Yes, that's why it's in Office

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 69 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

A salesman for an AI consulting company made the comment that we don't expect perfection from humans, so why should we expect it from AI? He was smug about it, too, like it was his big gotcha. Joke's on him, I'm the one that talked the bosses out of spending money with them.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 28 minutes ago

we don't expect perfection from humans, so why should we expect it from AI?

If we can't expect better from an AI than from a human, why should we use the AI (other than so you don't have to pay workers)?

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 hours ago

“Is your AI accountable for mistakes? All these idiots are…”

[–] RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's such a bad argument too. The whole point of technology is to help perfect the output of humans. Why would we buy technology that is known to not do that

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

"You can get pretty good results most of the time and save money on labor!" Not like our whole business model is focused on expertise and compliance or anything. Surely our clients won't mind a few little mistakes here and there, as a treat.

[–] RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

The neat part is that we can't even claim that they're little mistakes or that there's few of them.

[–] bpinyon@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Then why are they promoting it, in a pizza ad, as letting CoPilot handle the spreadsheets. Do they not trust their own product!?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago

They want your money, not your lawsuits.

[–] jinni@lemmy.world 99 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Deploy everywhere, trust nowhere. Bold strategy.

[–] tourist@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Standard fart operating procedure

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 33 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

for entertainment purposes only, not serious use — firm pushing AI hard

Reminds me of these Autopiloting cars LOL

They, do it all by themselves, fully and autonomously and are pushed so hard as well, but you may not rely on them, never take them for serious.

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

What regulatory capture of the FTC does to MFer.

All this shit should be considered false advertising, at the very least.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

That was my first thought, they're using the Fox News legal defense

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Proposed revision: Do not use Copilot for business purposes.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago

But also don't look at our advertisements.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Trillion dollar investments, dishing out private nuclear power plants, redistributing water allocation nationwide, using it in every level of every structure of society and it's just for entertainment.

Anyone tell the politicians they bent over like hand worn muppets for a gag or do you think they already know and simply enjoy being treated for the fools that they are?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

do you think they already know and simply enjoy being treated for the fools that they are?

You're assuming they aren't willingly participating in screwing over the constituents to line their pockets or g to give lucrative contracts to their friends

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

they already know, the money acts as lube

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 hours ago

If joke, why required shaped?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 hours ago

Are you not entertained?!

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 hours ago

It's almost like it's only a data harvesting tool. Why tf should they implement it everywhere for free?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

In other words: Snake oil salesman back paddles after the ice he‘s standing on got very thin.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think you were trying to say "backpedals."

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 36 minutes ago

Well, that's if they were on a bicycle, but they're standing on a paddle board over the ice. Why would they stand on a bicycle? that doesn't make sense. Neither does a paddle board on ice, but I already lost track of what the metaphor was about.