this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
463 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

85297 readers
3964 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

Damage children*. Let's be honest, it's quite clear that hiding nudity, sexual education or porn from children is generally damaging in the long term as that tends to come with development of mental disorders and weird fetishes like voyeur or sexually abusing women on trains

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Conceptually, I think this is a lot closer to where things need to be. I do understand that the application does fall short in some critical aspects of security though, and on that basis it would still need more work to be suitable.

I understand and agree with the general sentiment of resisting the surveillance state that is dominating tech ever more in this space of ID verification, but this looks to me like it would be okay if the app was built with some very strict secure-by-design approach... which it does NOT seem to be.

There should be stronger technical controls availble to keep kids away from the dangerous things online, and I do think governments can potentially play a positive role in that.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I do understand that the application does fall short in some critical aspects of security though

Actually it doesn't. I looked at the specs. Project seems to be open source, and uses solid cryptography to selectively reveal data you want to be revealed, and nothing more. This is absolute opposite to the UK garbage where you're asked to send your pics to every fraudster around.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

They're using type of zk-proofs that keep things private. This is completely different from the "upload your selfie" shit in UK

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›