this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
491 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

83858 readers
3147 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Spotify and several major record labels, including UMG, Sony, and Warner, secured a $322 million default judgment against the unknown operators of Anna's Archive. The shadow library failed to appear in court and briefly released millions of tracks that were scraped from Spotify via BitTorrent. In addition to the monetary penalty, a permanent injunction required domain registrars and other parties to suspend the site's domain names.

(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (6 children)

"Scraped from Spotify via Bitorrent" OK. That's not how that works.

[–] fantacyde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They were meaning that they released via BitTorrent the tracks which were scraped from Spotify

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago

Or they don't understand the topic

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually, for a while Spotify did use the BitTorrent protocol for content delivery. So this isn't too far-fetched.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 1 day ago

Spotify itself started by using pirated music, so this is all a bit ironic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] raicon@lemmy.world 107 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They did it guys!!! Piracy no more /s

Only billionaires and friends allowed

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

Gee I wonder why warehouses keep catching fires lately…

[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Funny, the statute $2500 should be for the circumvention act, which was likely singular, not per file obtained during or as a result of the act. And the $150k is ridiculous in and of itself, even if for all files obtained. What a strange world we live in.


Spotify built a system of control in order to profit a few at a cost to many, perhaps everyone else.

Someone broke that system in order to benefit many, possibly at the cost of some of their ability to profit from their system of control--if they didn't lose customers, or prospective customers, they didn't experience any financial loss, or a loss in their ability to maintain their system of control (which is still very much in place and working).

Either way, nobody was hurt.

But the person who acted selflessly to benefit of society in general is punished.

Because... We, as a society, celebrate and work effortlessly to maintain complex systems of abuse in order to satisfy our greed or the greed of others. All despite being taught in school not to lie to and bully each other, and to share with and care for each other.

As a species: We are bat shit fucking crazy!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

No, to enable (in the addiction sense) the greed of others. Not "satisfy." Because it can never be satisfied: they will take and take and take and take until there is nothing left, and still demand more.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

Fuck Spotify and their ICE recruitment ad bullshit.

I like their attitude.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

A default judgement just gives Spotify some leverage to try to collect money, property, and get injunctions. But as we know from the pirate bay cases, that's a losing whack-a-mole battle long term.

But it does make life a bit harder for Anna's archive unless they show up to fight back, which they probably won't.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

ChatGPT play a song that sounds suspiciously like enter sandman.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

These greed demons make me more of a socialist everyday. America is fucked in this AI race. If only the .001%% can create AI by owning all the property rights, how do they expect a society to collaborate & innovate?

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh, right, I should send them some monies.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Last I heard they only released the data on what they had, when did they release the actual music?

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They never released music, just metadata. It doesnt matter. This injunction is just legal posturing. They have no jurisdiction to tell foreign domain registrars to do anything. It takes an actual cop walking in on a data center to finally seize a site (surrender hard drives, reroute domains, etc.) If the server is in another country, it takes years to go through the red tape. If the country is not collaborative, it will never happen, specially since piracy is seen as a very low priority issue in the grand scheme of cyber crime.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

it never will. like "illicit" subs went down on reddit in '16, they fled to foreign sites so the us cant touch them,

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›