this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
158 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

6658 readers
424 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here lies darkness.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cookiecoookie@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

"Here be dragons" is more like it, it'd make more sense for the lizard-people believing crowd. Explain how any of the billionaires are any different from dragons at this point. They hoard wealth, act as sovereigns, most people fear and hate them, they fly around with their jets, cause immense harm to the environment, and basically subject the people to their every whim.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ultimately they want to be able to track every interaction you have online and tie it to your real life person. And they want to keep those record until the end of time. And they want AI and data analytics so that they can one day determine what "kind of person" you are.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago

mostly dissidents against the govt, and potentially track reproductive statistics of women.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I mean, they can say Linux must do it, but then Linux won't do it and then what? This will probably be as effective as the war on drugs or efforts to stop media piracy (or even just private copying). They try, they fail, they avoid the topic as much as possible.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Use DRM to block non-trusted OSes from accessing the web?

There's also straight-up banning PC ownership and forcing everyone onto thin clients connected to a government-controlled instance of Windows 365.

Another thing that could be done is banning any software that isn't sanctioned by MS, Google, Apple, etc.

[–] Noja@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Another thing that could be done is banning any software that isn’t sanctioned by MS, Google, Apple, etc.

Apple and Google are already doing that

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 4 points 1 week ago

Another thing that could be done is banning any software that isn’t sanctioned by MS, Google, Apple, etc.

We are the frogs in the boiling pot of app stores

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I personally would like to congratulate drugs for winning the war on drugs.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

unlike drugs being offered to people; people themselves have to learn and make efforts to install an os and use a web that doesn't comply with the law, so an overwhelming majority of people will just show their id's instead.

[–] artifex@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

If they're serious about it it will eventually be made into a requirement for serious services. I could imagine federal regulations requiring online banking, accessing government services (including school-related services), and maybe even ecommerce and payment processing looking for this trusted info, and refusing to run otherwise. Like TPM on steroids.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Then they'll just block Linux from accessing the web and force Windows as a state OS like NK forces Red Star as their state OS.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The US can kiss my shiny, metal ass.

[–] bold_omi@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

It's not that shiny.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

PALANTIR, GOOGLE, MS, META cant wait to get thier hands on this.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's why they're lobbying for it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Honesty I wouldn't be surprised if they wrote the legislation

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

They can't just verify age, they have to verify identity to verify age....

[–] Flashtrack@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago

They want to find the kiddies

[–] core@leminal.space 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When they say OS level age verification, they forget that everything has an OS, coffee makers, routers, cameras, cars, etc etc Verify your age before you can take a photo, or make coffee, that shit will die quick. And if it somehow doesn't, there will be hacks for it.

[–] imjustmsk@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

there will always be hacks, but the average person would just give up their ID and they won.