this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
266 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

84256 readers
3733 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 70 points 1 week ago (1 children)

aaand it boils water again

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's pretty neat though. It stays liquid the whole time. So you could circulate it to charge it up, somewhere other than where you want to extract the energy. But it looks like it charges from 300nm light (UV) so depending on its absorption bandwidth usefulness is questionable.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's plenty of sunlight energy at 300nm, even if most of it is in the visible spectrum.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I suspect it's sensitive to only a narrow band of frequencies, akin to the molecule's resonance frequency, but idk

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago

it's transparent too so you can just put pv panel underneath to capture the rest

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago

there is a problem that it can heat itself up so hard during decomposition that it can just go on without catalyst

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Billions of dollars invested to develop a new liquid

Meanwhile in Finland: https://polarnightenergy.com/news/worlds-largest-sand-battery-now-in-operation/

(Sand is one of the best ways to store heat and you get probably 4727482 tons of it for the price of 1ml of that novel liquid)

Edit: I am exaggerating slightly, in case some smooth brain did not get the hint already.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems like an old concept with new materials. Ive heard of gardeners leaving barrels of water in their greenhouse to help keep the localized temp above freezing overnight. Clearly those don't have nearly enough potential to boil water but yeah.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Solar water heaters definitely have the capacity to boil water, if they are made right (use a high temp transfer fluid, vacuum-insulated tubes, proper solar condensers, etc). It’d be difficult to get them to do it on a small scale without a heat pump of some sort in the mix, but even inefficient solar water heater setups need to be installed with a regular water heater after them mostly to down-regulate the temp as they get far far far too hot for practical use directly.

The greenhouse barrels are just for passive radiant heating, but if you use enough of them in the proper places, and insulate well, you can use them to make a passively-heated greenhouse that doesn't freeze at all, even up in the frigid northern climates (Canada, midwest US, Siberia, etc.)

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm all for new technology and approaches, and it looks like this is just at the beginning for this approach so I would assume it could grow in efficiency in the future.

However, as it stands today its pretty far away from a good replacement for existing solutions or approaches.

The new material, called a pyrimidone, can store more than 1.6 megajoules per kilogram. That is almost double the energy density of a conventional lithium-ion battery, which is about 0.9 MJ/kg.

1.6 MJ/kg..that's....not very dense for a thermal solution for this new material. This is especially true with the likely increase complexity of adding a plumbing system and heat exchanger to extract the energy. With the lithium battery its a pair of wires going in and the same wires coming out to move the stored energy. Further, the lithium battery energy is electrical which certainly can be converted to thermal energy at 100% efficiency with a simple coil of wire (resistor), but it can also be used electrically for all the fun things we use electrical energy for. The new technology solution looks to only be a thermal storage medium.

For reference 1 kg of gasoline has 45 MJ/kg. Keep in mind I'm not saying gasoline is a replacement, I just wanted to offer a scale for reference. Another approach suggested for storing sun energy in chemical form is ammonia which has about 19 MJ/kg. Yet another approach for storing solar thermal energy is sand batteries. A sand battery has a density of .4 to .8 MJ/kg ( 500 °C to 1000 °C respectively). Sand batteries would come with the same burden of a plumbing system and heat exchanger though but without any exotic materials.

None of this is to discourage the basic reseach these folks are doing. They could be onto the "next big thing", but I just wanted to put it in perspective as to where it is today.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, thermal batteries are great mainly just when you actually want heat. Think district heating or industrial processes. Trying tk drive a turbine with it to do other work loses you an order of magnitude in efficiency.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, thermal batteries are great mainly just when you actually want heat.

Right, that's what this new technology is, a liquid thermal battery. There's not electricity or motion generated by the OP article, just storing heat.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

you get 1.6MJ/kg just by irradiating this thing, nothing else is needed and its storable for months as noncorrosive room temperature liquid

to make ammonia you need to have pv to turn light to electricity then make hydrogen out of it then make ammonia in haber process, each step generates losses and none are practical on small scale

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't they put just use sunlight to heat water upwards and use that to propel generatorS? Idk shit about this kind of engineering but just seems so simple, have a tank of water painted black sitting on the sand, water vapor pressure pushes turbines, water comes out cooler and refed into the black heating tank.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

have a tank of water painted black sitting on the sand, water vapor pressure pushes turbines,

Water vapor by itself at any temperatures of unconcentrated sunlight would heat, wouldn't come close to the tempurature needed to turn a steam turbine to generate power. Most steam driven power plants have the steam be at about 500 °C. There is no place on Earth that would get even close to that by just placing a black painted barrel of water in direct sunlight.

You're not wrong in your general idea, but just the scale. The approach you're describing is close to how Concentrated solar power works. The idea to get up to those crazy high tempuratures from sunlight is to use mirrors to reflect a huge amount of sunlight on one small space. It looks like this:

There are a number of these built around the world. In fact, the solar thermal energy is so high its heating molten salt, which is later used to heat water to steam to turn a turbine generating power.

While Concentrated Solar Power works in both theory and practice, it has not been found to be more efficent for generating electricity in 2026 than just using a giant amount of Photo Voltaic solar panels instead. Many of the Concentrated Solar Power installations are being shut down because of this.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

They also tend to vaporize birds, which doesn't help. The birds can't see the concentrated beam of death until they are already in it, and then 'poof' no more bird.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

do they not understand that coolness counts for a lot so don't worry as much about efficiency?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Most electricity rate payers aren't interested in paying a "coolness" fee on their power bills. Worse, many are fine with paying less for dirtier sources of electricity than clean ones. Besides hydropower and some geothermal, its only been in the past 20 years or so where the cleaner tech is also the cheaper one in the forms widespread PV solar and wind.

[–] Hotzmon@fedinsfw.app 8 points 1 week ago

Comparing heat energy and electrical energy (heated water vs lithium-ion battery) tells you quite a lot of science in this news article. They are not the same, even tho both are joules or watt-hours. Joule also makes things sound huge, because you get to add the mega on the prefix.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Quite an interesting development and here’s hoping this makes it to production.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Drake landing did this 20 years ago with water, salt, sand.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That's a geothermal battery system with solar water heating as the input. But what's really cool about Drake Landing is that they can store energy from the summer to heat the homes in the winter, and they even hit net zero a few years ago.

Edit: No idea what the downvote is for... There's more info about this project here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_Landing_Solar_Community

It's a little disappointing to learn it was decommissioned, but the technology for seasonal energy storage is really interesting.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 2 points 6 days ago

all of that without heat pumps too

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Abstract from Science:

Storing sunlight in a compact and rechargeable form remains a central challenge for solar energy utilization. Molecular solar thermal (MOST) energy storage systems, which harness photon energy and release it as heat on demand, provide a direct approach, but have long failed to meet practical benchmarks. Inspired by the architecture of DNA, we report a pyrimidone-based MOST system that stores energy in the strained Dewar photoisomer upon excitation at 300 nm. Designed with sustainability in mind, the system operates solvent-free and remains compatible with aqueous environments while overcoming one of the field’s greatest hurdles: the controlled extraction and transfer of stored heat. When catalyzed by acid, the Dewar isomer releases enough heat to boil water (~0.5 mL). These advances help point the way toward decentralized solar heat storage and off-grid energy solutions.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Another nail in the coffin of "An Analysis of Water-Based Assumptions and Recalibration of Expectations for Evolutionary Models"