this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
495 points (97.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

15663 readers
440 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 169 points 5 days ago
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 31 points 4 days ago

Bicycles are vehicles. I definitely own it.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 97 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Good to see rural truck bros starting to learn what supporting authoritarians will get them.

[–] mellowistheyellow@lemmy.zip 23 points 5 days ago

Theyre a little too late, actually a lotta too late

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 76 points 5 days ago (15 children)

More reasons to own a bike, the government can't do shit!

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 29 points 5 days ago (4 children)

What if car industry sponsored government doesn't allow bike lanes?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 17 points 5 days ago

I wasn't asking for permission.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 days ago (17 children)

You don't need bike lanes to ride!

[–] psud@aussie.zone 8 points 4 days ago

You need bike lanes to encourage more people to ride

Not many people are willing to take a lane

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 19 points 5 days ago (3 children)

It cracks me up to see bike companies adding wireless electronic shit to bikes, like, shifting and turn signals. Those bikes will die while my 2008 trek hybrid keeps rolling.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 87 points 5 days ago (2 children)

We were due for a new car, but because of all the data garbage wasn't keen on brand new. My wife found a 2004 car in mint mechanical condition and pristine interior, so went back in time.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 40 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Maybe a company somewhere will recognize this emerging market.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 33 points 5 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I've been riding motorcycles for a couple decades and now that they're all fancy and computer controlled, most bike have their ECUs cracked within a couple years. Granted most of the time it's to remove Euro-5 emissions controls 🙄, or remove speed limiters. But could this be an option to disable car surveillance?

I recognize car companies will probably retaliate by saying you voided warranty, but so far most motorcycle companies don't do that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Dystopian. This shit is going to be everywhere.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 32 points 5 days ago (6 children)

"acoustic lip reading"? Reading lips by sound waves wouldn't they just put a microphone in there?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Most states require two party consent to record audio otherwise it's wiretapping.

Acoustic ultrasonic distance mapping isn't counted as wiretapping. They aren't recording your speech, they're inferring your speech.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 31 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Theres probably sone regulation against actually just recording the conversation...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jadetoffee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

we live in a fucking dystopian nightmare, i hate it here

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 28 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Just get whatever car you want, disconnect the cell network antenna, and connect that wire through a resistor to ground. The car will forever think it's outside of cell signal range and will operate with none of the connectivity features, none of the spyware, none of the 'emergency' controls.

There's maybe still a bit of concern about your car preserving data on its internal storage that you'd rather it not preserve, but other than that, this is a simple fix that solves all the 'car is too high tech' issues. If you don't know how to do it yourself, I'm sure you can find some independent mechanics who will do it for you.

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 68 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ah congrats, not only have you voided your warranty, but your insurance company now refuses to insure your vehicle, and it cannot be legally driven.

That is where this is headed.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Where it's headed? Maybe...

But that's definitely not where it is now. A small, reversible modification like this won't void your warranty in any meaningful way (unless you then go in to make a warranty claim about your connectivity features not working). And no insurance company is going to care whether you've disconnected the internet connection antenna -- even if they wanted to ... how would they know?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The insurance companies already have dongles that "give you a discount" (read: price-gouge anyone not using them) for snooping on your driving. I'm sure they're very excited for that functionality to be built into all cars so they have an excuse to make it mandatory for providing coverage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I bet they got a failsafe for that too. Like 2 weeks to a month later, you get something of a hard fail error that shuts everything down and forces you to contact the manufacturer for maintenance...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean you don't own public transit anyway so maybe this will renew a public transit push.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 14 points 5 days ago

No surprise coming from a company that was founded by a nazi and also build most cop cars.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That's not how patents work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

I have a 2020 model CUV. Bit after infotainment, but before the all-digital dash bullshit.

I will be driving it until the wheels fall off, or until gas is literally no longer available.

[–] TheDoctorDonna@piefed.ca 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why does this video feel like AI? Not trying to cast doubt on the content by any means - fuck car manufactures (and iirc Mercedes is already doing something similar), but the random speeds and weird inflections make this feel like AI slop.

[–] jpeps@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Pretty sure it's slightly sped up, which might be giving it an uncanny feel.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›