this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
51 points (96.4% liked)

Ask Science

16490 readers
24 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm asking this because there is a scifi book I'm reading, and in the book there's a scene where someone is communicating with a person in a spacecraft moving at lightspeed. I know their ability to communicate would probably not be possible, but let's just put that aside for a second. Hypothetically, if you could communicate with someone moving lightspeed, would the time dilation make it so that they would appear to be moving and speaking very slowly relative to you?

(page 2) 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bubs12@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 week ago

Where is Hank Green when you need him?

Think Star Trek uses a stability feild so the time dilation is void. I'm trying to remember but they actually turned it off in one episode and jumped to like Jupiter and back to close the time gap. So, they could be using a similar idea of technology.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Huh?

What manner of communication moves faster than light?

It would have to be some sort of entanglement, And I think the entanglement would also normalize any time dilation. There's not exactly a way to test that yet, it's all hypothetical.

But it should just cancel out and be like you're talking to someone in the same room.

Like, there's no way for the communication (in any form) to go faster than light continuously. If it was two stationary points than wormholes or other stuff could work.

But moving at light speed, it has to be entanglement

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What manner of communication moves faster than light?

It would have to be some sort of entanglement, And I think the entanglement would also normalize any time dilation. There’s not exactly a way to test that yet, it’s all hypothetical.

Yeah, in the book I'm reading this conversation is facilitated through quantum entanglement. Though I know in real life that wouldn't be possible because entanglement still can't be used to transmit information faster than light.

And I think the entanglement would also normalize any time dilation.

This is interesting. How does that work?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Though I know in real life that wouldn’t be possible because entanglement still can’t be used to transmit information faster than light.

The entire point of it, is that it can...

How does that work?

It's still entangled...

Everything about the two still has to be exactly the same, even adjusted for time dilation.

So if one is experiencing 10x the speed, 1 second of its "input" takes 10 seconds on the slow side to "output". The 1/10th speed replies and 1 second there is "output" as 10 seconds, just like it's relatively spinning 10x the speed as the reference particle.

Again, technically hypothetical because we can't build anything like that yet to actually see if it wouldnhappen. It's just one of those things where it just has to work out like that logically even though we can't see it.

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Though I know in real life that wouldn’t be possible because entanglement still can’t be used to transmit information faster than light.

The entire point of it, is that it can…

Intuitively it seems like it should, but apparently that doesn't work.

So if one is experiencing 10x the speed, 1 second of its “input” takes 10 seconds on the slow side to “output”. The 1/10th speed replies and 1 second there is “output” as 10 seconds, just like it’s relatively spinning 10x the speed as the reference particle.

Ah okay I see what you mean. So I guess, for one participant in the conversation would seem like they were talking very slowly, and the other would seem to be talking very fast. But they could still be in sync, they would just perceive the time differently

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From the link:

Though scientists still debate how the seemingly bizarre phenomenon of entanglement arises, they know it is a real principle that passes test after test. In fact, while Einstein famously described entanglement as "spooky action at a distance," today's quantum scientists say there is nothing spooky about it.

"It may be tempting to think that the particles are somehow communicating with each other across these great distances, but that is not the case," says Thomas Vidick, a professor of computing and mathematical sciences at Caltech. "There can be correlation without communication," and the particles "can be thought of as one object."

I mean...

The alternative to them communicating but still somehow staying in sync...

Is that they have to be the same particle, that's the alternative.

That the one electron theory isnt just real, it works on subatomic particles sometimes which in this context is orders of magnitude large...

You think that simplifies but it makes it way crazier.

for one participant in the conversation would seem like they were talking very slowly, and the other would seem to be talking very fast.

The exact opposite...

I don't know how to put it any simpler.

Think of it as writing text on a string of ticker tape. The wider the tape, the bigger text, the faster the tape comes out by inches of length.

To relay the same info on a skinner piece of ticker tap, the text shrinks, and the tape comes out slower by length.

Regardless of the size of the text, or the speed the tape, the information is coming out at the same speed consistent speed.

But like,instead of a ticket tape, think of it as x seconds of speech.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it depend on whether they are moving toward you or away from you? 🤔

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Like the doppler effect? Sounds coming from a thing moving toward you change differently than sounds moving away fron you.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That only works if you are speaking through the same medium. The sound waves compress or elongate. If you are talking to someone on a spaceship, the conversation would presumably be transferred from analog, to digital, back to analog, like a phone call. It's not like if you call someone on an airplane you hear the Doppler Effect on their voice.

[–] Pascaloi@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

That gave me a hilarious image in my head thinking about a Doppler shifted phone call from a plane.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›