this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
18 points (95.0% liked)

Asklemmy

54191 readers
381 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I keep getting ads saying things like "landfills produce more methane pollutants than 56000 cars" or "tell Congress to fix this one methane leak." I also hear people bring up farming cows as a counter-arguement for any climate action (but not as a "let's fix this" type arguement sadly). So my thinking is why aren't people trying to harvest methane and use it for something? Is it inefficient? Are they stupid?

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] musicalphysics@discuss.online 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Methane was rebranded as natural gas and is used to generate electricity, heat homes, and cook food. Among other uses.

[–] AstroLightz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Among other uses

That's ominous as hell. Are you a hitman? /j

Nope, a mad scientist

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 11 points 3 days ago

afaik it's used as fuel a lot, natural gas stuff like LNG and CNG

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because methane is a byproduct of the petroleum industry, it's very cheap. They have so much gas, they torch of a whole lot of it all the time. Which is a good thing, because releasing it as CO2 is actually better than releasing it as methane, obviously releasing it at all is a really bad thing.

It being so cheap makes it really hard for alternative sources to be viable, since it would be more complex and thus more expensive. It is done, but mostly because of regulation, subsidies and as an environmental measure.

Methane does break down fairly fast (still takes years), we keep releasing so much of it, it does contribute a lot to climate change. We are adding more than gets broken down. And even after it breaks down, it's still contributing to the amount of CO2, so better but not good.

[–] Pissed@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

90 years is quite a long time.

a couple of the larger cattle operations near me actually do have the manure go to a 'digester' where the methane is captured and pumped into the natural gas distribution system.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's too bad we can't get animals (including ourselves) to hold it all day then dispense it into a fuel tank for home use.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

what if we kept the animals in a big dome

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What if we kept them underground. We could build a city above it. It would be a hub for trade, exchanging methane for other goods. We could call it Bartertown.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

"Not shit - energy"

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 days ago

there are biogas plants converting the "natural" methane (from organic waste) into the methane in your stove/furnace

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Harvesting methane from landfills and livestock waste is done, it’s just not nearly as efficient as getting it from the ground.

And while it’s a potent greenhouse gas it breaks down much faster than CO2 in the atmosphere

[–] musicalphysics@discuss.online 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And while it’s a potent greenhouse gas it breaks down much faster than CO2 in the atmosphere

Incorrect. Methane breaks down into CO2. After it causes the atmosphere to retain significantly more heat. As CO2 it continues to contribute to climate change.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

isn't it more like methane creates CO2 if burned (CH4+2O2->CO2+2H2O)? methane released from cows for example wouldn't be burnt, how would that change to CO2? (i don't know much about this, please correct me if i'm wrong)

Yep, methane creates CO2 when burned. Atmospheric methane reacts with atmospheric OH to also make CO2 and water.