this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
31 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

6683 readers
864 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smeg@infosec.pub 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If the penalty for criminal conduct is a fine, and the fine isn't sufficiently punitive to radically alter the company's conduct, then crime is just a cost of doing business.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

If breaking a law is only punishable by a fine, then it’s only a law for poor people.

[–] elfpie@beehaw.org 3 points 12 hours ago

I'm pretty sure someone asked that question when they tried to prevent robotaxis on the streets, but someone else got paid to skip the bureaucracy. Now they will collect extra money from the companies for not being road ready.

If they are treating tech flaws as a crime, all the violations come from the exact same driver. Take the license away.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Please just boot them, for everyone’s safety.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

You're wrong. Driverless vehicles are safer, according to all data I've seen.

Here's one such example:

Of 2,052 AV incidents reported to the NHTSA, autonomous vehicles were solely at fault for only 4% of accidents that involved other road users.

The vast majority of AV-caused injuries involve animals; only 14 human injuries have resulted from the 234 incidents where an AV was at fault. There have been zero human fatalities caused by an AV from 2021-2025.

System malfunctions aren’t common; hardware or software failures accounted for 7.8% of incidents where the autonomous vehicle was found to be at fault.

I'm happy to stand corrected if there's data that points otherwise, but I'd rather stick to facts.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Ticket goes to the individual car. If the car does not pay by X period of time, it goes to jail. Pretty soon there will be prison gangs of autonomous cars.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 2 points 11 hours ago

and then the AI that runs the cars will contract you out to go collect the rogue ones because it thinks you're all buddy buddy with it cause It dropped off the corpse of your best friend at their moms house.