this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
1032 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84569 readers
3844 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I’m shaking in my boots, Utah. I’m skared!!! Prove that I’m surfing PORN. Maybe I just want to protect my privacy and stop my ISP from selling my online activities. But also, porn. I know Europe has a few countries imposing this, but damn am I glad to not be in the USA anymore. I’d likely be shot and killed leading a revolution. At least people would have a martyr…

Mullvad has quantum resistance and DIATA. Only when VPNs are outlawed will this be an issue.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

If conservatives really wanted to protect children, most of the GOPs leadership would be in prison.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait, how long until literally any software business realizes what this is, and hard lobbies against it?

You basically must conduct all your business unencrypted in the state of Utah if this is to be understood.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Only business that would require an ID/Age Verification check, but yeah. Except they don't want to hold actual websites liable. They want to hold ISP's liable.

There's literally no way to know if the people using the VPN's are located in Utah. So this law would be unenforceable against actual websites.

It might possibly be enforceable against ISP's but the problem is, once you fire up a VPN your ISP can only see your entry point and maybe that there is a volume of traffic going to and from your device. They can't see what websites you visit (provided your VPN is properly configured).

I also don't understand how this bill could effectively lay any blame against the websites for knowing you use a VPN because they also can't see any of that information. They know that you visited and from a specific IP "located" in "place" and they can either assume that the use of a VPN means you're in Utah (very unlikely), or they can assume you're not (more likely given the population that lives outside Utah).

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would bet my shoes Facebook or someone lobbied for this.

It’s easy to blame Mormons, but I think that bloc was more of a mark.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spagbolioli@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago

I remember the days before corporations started to see the internet as a sales and advertising platform and governments allowed it to grow organically. It was honestly great. I miss those days

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 1 week ago

When you trade the kids for money, favors, even inside the church, you're still a G-d damned PIMP. Fuck them. This is about protecting pimps, not kids.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›