this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
1017 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

87680 readers
3576 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Full Report(PDF).

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] posturemaxxing@lemmy.wtf 9 points 4 months ago

the SOY gmod method vs the CHAD fake mustache

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

As I understand it, most adult content producers aren't actually interested in having minors using their sites. It seems like the easiest thing to do would be to have them add some "Adult Material" flag in their metadata, and let consumers respond as they wish to that tag - whether that's done through browser settings, router nannyware, or whatever.

Is there a technical reason this isn't what's being pushed for? I'm sure there's lobbying and "optics" reasons for not doing this, but is there any practical reason for not pursuing this, or something like it?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

A freshly-washed face is the new wiped browser history.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 4 months ago

I heard three kids where able to use a trenchcoat to bypass it!

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's always an analog loop to curb censorship. It's just a waste of money.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Not for the people pushing for this Orwellian shit.

Most people will just comply, and "most people" is who they want to spy on and control.

[–] fargeol@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago
[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

The Internet views censorship as a fault and will re-route around it.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

we need to go back to the tried and true method of a calendar field to prove age. i know that kept me out of all the dirty sites back when i was born in 1979 through 84.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Anyone know the best way to fool these age verification tools? I've got some Discord servers with channels that are marked as NSFW mainly out of an abundance of caution, despite mainly just being open to rude language. And others where it's just slightly spicy memes.

I am old enough, I just don't want to give my real face or ID to Discord or their chosen third parties. I don't trust them. Have tried pointing OBS at videos of people staring straight at the screen, but those don't quite seem to work.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Don't use discord? Problem solved.

And I really am serious. We need to move away from platforms we have no control over and contribute to the problem.

[–] quack@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

We probably shouldn't be using Discord but you've got to meet people where they're at. Telling someone to just drop a service when all of their connections are there is unhelpful at best.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Thanks, but that is a thoroughly unhelpful piece of advice.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, there's always the ancient method that teens used to get their hands on alcohol when I was that age: pay someone who's down on their luck for ten minutes of their time.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That feels kinda gross and exploitative. Because it's not like alcohol. This is something I very well could do myself, but refuse to do on principle, because I don't want to hand over personal data like that. Paying someone else to hand over their data feels gross.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›