this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
1269 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

48499 readers
490 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago

So, is there any information besides a screenshot?

[–] TiredTiger@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago

This is just ID verification in another guise. The second I see one of these, I'll stop using the website I see it on.

[–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

how is ubuntu touch or kde touch going? when i switch to my next phone Android might be a no go

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Kde mobile...exists. It's even possible to run it. I wouldn't expect an amazing performance though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] angband@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All these captchas just make me evaluate effort vs need. Facebook throws a captcha every time because I log in from a private window. Before it just gave me a warning unrelated to my interests. I mostly use facebook for work, and those sweet lawnmowing videos. If they keep it up I will only log in for work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xorollo@leminal.space 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To anyone not switching because of this-- in my experience this is something I can work around. On most websites my captchas still work. I have had a few that dont work, and I just close the website and move on. It hasn't happened on any websites that are very important for me to visit. Usually its a store and they really me to install their stupid app. Nope.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 194 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If google requires me to permit other companies to leech all my personal data to be able to use anything on the Internet at all, I say we label Google, Microsoft, Apple as criminal organizations

I'm sorry, bit there have to be limits.

I. DO. NOT. WANT. TO. USE. ANYTHING. GOOGLE.

OR APPLE. OR MICROSOFT.

FUCK ALL THESE OLIGARCH COMPANIES INTO THE GROUND

I do not want my private data leeches and sold every day, I don't even get paid for it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 289 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This is really bad even just from the perspective of user behavior. Training people to scan QR codes from anything that looks like a captcha box is HORRIBLE for security.

"Thanks for scanning the code, just one more step! Please input your phone number, and type in the code you receive."

Boom, account stolen.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 points 22 hours ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

That's a raid!

Stand your ground.

[–] razen@lemmy.world 105 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They should be fined so hard for this shit.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A fine is brushed off in a quarter. They should be forced to split into seperate companies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] m105@discuss.tchncs.de 222 points 2 days ago (17 children)

well, I guess i will stop using those websites from my /e/os fairphone

[–] Programman4233@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago

isn't that like half the internet?

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Don't give money to google by buying Pixel phones. Even buying used, creates demand as people are more likely to keep upgrading every year as they know it will be easy to sell their used Pixels for a good price.

[–] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

the pixel is a very secure phone from a hardware level, the full list of security features missing from other android manufacturers is in the grapheneos faq

there is no comparable alternatives right now, though something might come out of the graphene and motorola deal

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TootTootComingThru@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is and there never will be a perfect solution and you shouldn't let an imperfect solution stop you from using the best one of these just because buying a used pixel MIGHT urge somebody to buy another new one. You may not want to do that, but it is silly and way too idealistic and impractical to demand others not to switch to Graphene because of that.

Buying a used pixel to degoogle and make your phone more secure and less likely to spy on you more than balances out the potential for there being one more new pixel on the future. There will never be a perfect solution and this one is fine enough for most. You may disagree and that's ok.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 14 points 1 day ago

Choosing not to buy one now isn't going to help anything at all.

[–] Cantaloupe@lemmy.fedioasis.cc 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I should be good with sandboxed Google play.

But wtf we’ll need a phone to solve captchas now? What happens if you don’t have one?

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cafuneandchill@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (6 children)

First, don't.

Second, at least you won't get bombarded by auto mods spamming suicide hot line number.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ISOmorph@feddit.org 179 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

That would only make me install Graphene even harder if I wasn't already writing from a phone with it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i havent noticed anything? except youtube being slow as always i supposr (/e/os user)

[–] Freakazoid@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Blocking .js might do the trick...

[–] Freakazoid@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

YouTube is slow because a .js script that put a 5 sec artificial delay in time for using adblockers on the site.

Yt implemented it a while back.

[–] FeelThePower@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 2 days ago (3 children)

i have one myself, and I can tell you that grapheneos won't be affected by this. the real damage is to people using things like dumb phones or BSD, even windows computers are effectively locked out of the internet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›