this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
286 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

84603 readers
4767 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

So are smartphones, and every other tech. I am going to wait a while before getting AR glasses, so people calm down.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 16 points 2 hours ago

When you see someone with those take out your phone and take a closeup picture of them. See how they like it...

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I am distraught to learn that apparently smart glasses are not banned in the EU. Until now I assumed without checking that they obviously would be.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Interestingly in most of the EU, there's is no expectation of privacy in public and you are free to record people without their concent.

Releasing or using those recordings is a completely different thing though.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 points 1 hour ago

You're free to record a crowd of people in public. Once you're pointing the camera at a person specifically, that's a whole different issue.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

We are all vexed little rubberneckers. It's a human trait.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 39 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Glasshole the term needs to make a significant comeback. Normalize shunning, put up signs on bathrooms and anywhere else you can with

"'Smart' glasses forbidden. Fines applicable. Bluetooth detection active." and perhaps "This means you Glasshole ! "

whether such detection is active is moot, make the bastards as nervous as they should be. A (dummy) camera on the outside of the door should complete the illusion. Make them feel like perverts.

Non consensual filming should be unacceptable, but that's a whole other fight.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Bluetooth detection active

Yea, I'd love to get a fine for listening to music while I shit.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You can search specifically for smart glasses, e.g. the aptly named Nearby Glasses

Also, you likely can't fine them, but you can make them think about it.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 54 minutes ago)

Bluetooth devices have MAC addresses which can help tell Meta glasses apart from other BT devices.

Apparently in this case it's a bit more complicated and you have to rely on https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/assigned-numbers/ to identify glassholes.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 29 points 7 hours ago

Dystopian stuff. The public should be protected from this stuff.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 92 points 10 hours ago (21 children)

I want to like smart glasses. And wearable tech in general. Too bad it's all entirely centralized, monetized, and exploited for political gain.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 7 points 2 hours ago

When I learnt about the concept I was immediately in. Even just the option to remind me of people's names would be life-changing, not to mention all the other information and reminders and whatnot not only at my fingertips but right into my eyeballs.

And then Google's glasses came out and were a data privacy nightmare and that day I think I lost another bit of my childhood innocence.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 4 hours ago

Too bad it's all entirely centralized, monetized, and exploited ~~for political gain.~~ as a fascist surveillance method.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 10 points 8 hours ago

Same. I gave up on the tech future a long time ago.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 hours ago

I'm sure the people who have them love harvesting data for AI training since that's what they are clearly for.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 31 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I remember back in the early 2000s, when MiniDV cameras got popular.

They were all obviously a camera just based on the look, they had an obvious lens cap, and even a clear record light so that people could see that they were being recorded.

It is insane that we have done away with all of that, and are actively camouflaging cameras in every day items.

Smart glasses should be banned.

[–] pingu@piefed.europe.pub 18 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What we need is regulation. These companies will not show ethical behaviour on their own.

See e.g. right to repair, USB-C.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›