this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
487 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

85837 readers
3808 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Muhaha. Those morons were never software engineers in the first place. A software engineer would neither benefit from LLM any more than from a deterministic assistant (tenplates), nor would they be stupid enough to label a stochastic slop generator as "AI".

(Yes, this is a "no true scotsman" kind of argument, yet I stand by it. People who call this bullshit AI, as well as people who claim it is better than coding stuff yourself, should not be let anywhere near any kind of software more relevant than a mobile game, and probably not even those)

[–] Mearcfara@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

is this much different than IT guys not knowing how to solder anymore? I started my career learning about individual components and doing math by hand, and shortly after I was told that all we did was swap cards. My job eventually turned into a more or less normal IT job (compared to what it was), and by the time I moved on, we weren't even using command prompts anymore.

I remember asking one of my instructors about how layer 1 can generate layer 2, and he had an idea, but couldn't really point at components and give an explanation. One could say that I represent that first step in the death of knowledge due to convenience and optimization, but it hasn't really negatively affected me outside of curiosity. Even when I'm working on legacy equipment and actually do have to bust out a soldering iron, that's usually because I'm being cheap and don't want to buy new cards.

So, this makes me wonder: is it really all that bad if someone can't sit down and write lines and lines of code, but can understand it well enough to direct AI? I've used AI to help me code in some unfamiliar languages and all of the outputs I got were utterly unusable. So, in my anecdote, it didn't make up for my lack of skill in the slightest.

I say this as someone who taught himself blacksmithing on principle, so it's not like i'm some techbro or something. Obligatory I think AI is overpromised, but this seems like one of the few things it can actually assist with, assuming the person using it is capable enough to be using it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

You still need to review and verify the code, actually implement it, and improve it if you use AI.

If you just blindly accept it then you're just lazy to begin with.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

that happens across all technological industries. when cars first became available, hsnds were needed to build them. nowadays most of it is done by robots. clerical workers were replaced by computers. and now "artificial intelligence" machines are trying to replace artists and writers, editors, and managers. unfortunately, the people that do those jobs are not just going to keel over and disappear. at what technological point do we stop and say thats enough? there has even been talk of replacing ceos with ai. are shareholders next? nobody will be able to buy those products anymore either

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

People lost their abilities to use slide rules too, to write assemblers, etc. The big companies monopolizing the tech are bad, but the tech is here to stay.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

This.

For some reason they hate is really strong this time around but it's the exact same thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Swuden@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m fully able to code still, I just find it pointless when AI can do it for me. It’s like having to be somewhere, should I take the car or walk? Yeah walking might be good for me and the environment, but my car is so much faster and easier and I’ll definitely be on time. Who cares about the consequences of the future?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 0 points 1 month ago

I took and passed a coding bootcamp at the eve of the first LLMs and generative AI. I had to do similar courses on my own to refresh my skills. I never found a coding job (story of my life!) But if I needed to I can do another course to refresh and start over stronger.

What are they so panicky about?

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I doubt anyone can actually calculate a line of best using ordinary least square linear regression by hand with no mistakes but no one's crying about that. LLMs are just the next generation of calculators and programs.

[–] ameen272@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For the first sentence: Yes, that's why computers are popular. For the second sentence: They're more like the next generation of algorithms, not whole calculators.

I'll proceed to eat your feesh now.

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That second point is just a distinction without a difference. Being pedantic doesn’t add anything to the conversation.

[–] ameen272@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just admit you're wrong at this point man

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not though, you were being pedantic and glossing over the whole point.

[–] ameen272@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why am I even talking to a person with negative score anyway, you're up to no good.

[–] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ahhh... So you're retarded.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I feel like AI is a 5G language, in that we have moved on from writing code directly to writing md files to command the bots to write the code. It seems like a higher abstraction of the code. It does make you think less about the code directly, and more about the bigger picture, but you still need those skills to check the bots output.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Don't know why you got downvoted, you're 100% right. It's just another layer of abstraction. Like a super high level non-deterministic level of abstraction.

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It seems there a lot of people on Lemmy who dislike anything AI. I have no choice at my work so I have to make the best of it as I’m not leaving my job in this economy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›