Maybe it’s the cameras themselves that are the privacy concern, hmm?
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)
Privacy
50695 readers
638 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
No, it's fine if the state has access to that data, it's not a privacy concern. It's only if citizens can see it that it becomes a problem. /s
Throw the cameras in jail!
Why not deport them?
Flock cameras should be illegal, and it would be better if they were all destroyed.
They do so much damage to privacy. There's no way these things should exist.
Wouldn't it fall under 2a to just shoot all these?
Yeah it's right in the amendment:
Thou shalt keep thyself strapped at all times when around shady electronics. What will YOU do when your printer makes a noise you don't recognize?
I couldn't reach the article so I found another one from the Everett Herald https://www.heraldnet.com/news/judge-denies-request-to-exempt-flock-footage-from-public-records-act/