this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
198 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

84769 readers
3821 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 27 points 8 hours ago

Meta workers privacy invaded.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 69 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I find it pretty funny that some jerkoff who works for facebook is complaining about privacy violations. The companies entire business model relies on disrespecting privacy.

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.social 27 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I do my best to have solidarity with the entire working class, but 👉👈

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.social 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

“I'm mixed on Al. On one hand, I really enjoy using it to write software. On the other hand, I'm really nervous about its impact on the world,” the engineer wrote in an internal forum for coders.

Yeah, that's the catch isn't it? On one hand, we're ceding skills to oligarch-owned chat bots that are working day and night to create to neofeudal police state where their air conditioned bunkers can survive the climate apocalypse, but on the other hand, it makes your job slightly easier (until you're inevitably laid off).

It's a really tough spot to be in.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 hours ago

I think figuring out how to find solidarity across the working class is a guidepost to revolution.

It's more than okay to admit that it's challenging. Anything else is just untrue.

I do think the effort is worth it. I think uniting for a better world is the prize we win when we figure out how to construct a society that accommodates as much diversity of thought and lifestyle as our civilization contains.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

And I say "fuck em" until they actually change their stance and views. People might say "oh you need to be tolerant and patient and teach them the error of their ways," but these are the people that know damn well the impact AI is having on literally everything but they're still just going "whee! It makes my job easier for 5 minutes!"

So, fuck em.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yea, let's get ride of computers all together. In fact, let's destroy the loom too!

[–] aGamerFarFarAway@programming.dev 1 points 27 minutes ago

I'll go get my sledgehammer.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Zahille7, I find it disturbing how you and several others relish the thought of siding with the Facebook CEO and against his workers, looking for literally any sin to attack them.

Of course he's wrong about AI. So are a bunch of cashiers. You expressed the desire to go after them too.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I'm not "going after" anyone. Nor am I siding with any billionaire or CEO.

I'm specifically saying that these coders and other tech people who are deep in the know, continue to use AI regardless of the environmental and social impact; they've made their bed, and now they need to lie in it. I have no sympathy for them for saying "hey, I don't like being surveilled at work, but it's totally fine for others to do it."

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 56 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I don’t want to live in a world where humans—employees or otherwise—are exploited for their training data.

Does anybody read the job description anymore?

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

Also meta is all about exploiting people, not sure what did they expect joining it

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Nobody takes responsibility for the consequences of their work. It's always, "well people need a job"

Fuck that

[–] DeuxChevaux@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago

Yeah yeah, but surveillance is meant for everyone else, surely not for them. The safest place to be is inside the lion's den innit.

Until it isn't.

[–] esc@piefed.social 33 points 11 hours ago

So they feel that surveillance isn't so great when it directly affects them? Poor ghouls, I'm going to cry for their plight in the next never.

[–] ataraxya@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago

Meta’s decision to track employee keystrokes and mouse data is causing an uproar within the company. “Selfishly, I don't want my screen scraped because it feels like an invasion of my privacy,” wrote an engineer in an internal post seen by nearly 20,000 coworkers this week. “But zooming out, I don't want to live in a world where humans—employees or otherwise—are exploited for their training data.”

The message aimed to rally support for a petition circulating inside the company since last Thursday that demands an end to what Meta calls the Model Capability Initiative. It’s a piece of mandatory software that Meta began installing on the laptops of US employees last month. The tool records employees’ screens when using certain apps with the goal of collecting “real examples of how people actually use” computers, including “mouse movements, clicking buttons, and navigating dropdown menus,” according to Reuters. Meta has yet to say whether the initial data is paying off.

“I'm mixed on Al. On one hand, I really enjoy using it to write software. On the other hand, I'm really nervous about its impact on the world,” the engineer wrote in an internal forum for coders. “And what kind of norms are we establishing about how the technology is used, and how people are going to be treated?”

The petition, also seen by WIRED, states that “it should not be the norm that companies of any size are permitted to exploit their employees by nonconsensually extracting their data for the purposes of Al training.”

In the US, employers generally have wide latitude to monitor workers’ devices for security, training, evaluation, and safety purposes. But using these tools to build datasets that instruct AI systems on navigating computers without human supervision appears to be a new tactic—and one that doesn’t sit right with many Meta workers. Over the past few years, several companies have jumped into the race to develop agentic AI models. But when gathering data, they have typically tapped volunteers, sometimes paid, who are willing to have their computer activity recorded.

Meta’s decision to move forward with its tracking tool despite weeks of protest from employees has become one of the leading reasons for what 16 current and former employees recently described to WIRED as record-low morale. It’s also the leading driver of an employee unionization effort at Meta’s UK offices.

“The workplace surveillance and training AI models is the number one thing,” says Eleanor Payne, a representative of United Tech and Allied Workers, which is helping organize Meta employees. She declined to specify the number of employees seeking to form a labor union but called it “significant” and unprecedented.

While only US employees are currently subjected to tracking, UK employees are concerned for their colleagues and the potential for expansion of the program. “I think of it pretty much as a breakdown of trust,” Payne says. New laws that eased unionization in the UK have encouraged employees about the chances of success, she adds.

In Meta offices in California and New York, workers have been posting flyers in cafeterias and other communal areas pointing colleagues to the petition. Two employees, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media, say the company has removed some posters, with those on bathroom walls seemingly staying up longer.

Meta declined to comment on the allegation.

Petition organizers have called on Meta to respect their legal right “to discuss, organize, and advocate for better working conditions.” So far, organizers have declined to comment on the number of signatories and whether they may pursue other legal or regulatory actions to push back on the tracking program.

The engineer’s internal post this week chronicled what they believe to be a degradation in Meta’s culture over the past 11 years, with much of the shift happening in the past five. “Layoffs, budget cuts, years of efficiency and intensity—all of it contributed to a growing sense of dread,” the employee wrote. They described growing apathetic about their work and workplace, until the rollout of the tracking software stunned them.

“MCI is a microcosm for the Al movement,” the engineer added. “Yes, it's just a small turn of the temperature knob, but it's representative of the types of systems that people will be compelled to build.”

They addressed skepticism and fear about the petition drive by underscoring the value of collective action: “Your voice matters. Moments like this are why I was drawn to Facebook in the first place.”

Some workers reluctant to sign the petition are quietly staging their own form of protest by delaying installation of the screen recording tool, sources say. It means dealing with a nagging notification. How long Meta will accept the maneuver is unclear to employees. But after layoffs hit next week, the company will have 10 percent fewer people to try and wrangle.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Fastest way to get employees to unionize!