this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
905 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

84830 readers
4226 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I recently watched a video about the first electronic synthesizer. It was built in 1897, and was housed in the basement of an entire city block in NYC. Several decades later, and it would fit in a suitcase, with far more functionality. It worked, but it was huge and unwieldly, to the point of being completely impractical. It needed to wait until the technology caught up to it, and made it a truly viable instrument, and not just a concept.

Data Centers are like that 1897 synthesizer. It works, sure, but at what cost? It's expensive in every way, from the building costs, the energy costs, the environmental costs, etc. We have a concept and a prototype, but not a truly viable product yet. Maybe in a decade or two, with a proper goal in mind, we can get there, but right now, Data Centers are just that big, dumb synthesizer that takes up a city block.

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ah but that's where you're mistaken. The electronic Synthesizer actually had a use. Data centers are a waste the whole way around, and they always will be.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If you are trying to keep something cool why would you put it in Arizona

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 8 points 15 hours ago

Because as humans we are insanely stupid. I think we all know the answer. Money is why Arizona. We don't do what's right. We do what is cheap and effective. It just happens that sometimes that is right too.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Good thing it's not hot in Phoenix.

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Debating a data center IMO is the same as debating a Nazis right to exist. They should've been stopped before they could get going and now that its too late to stop them we just gotta kill them instead.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder how muchv it raises from you know, ever multi giga watt power plant?

[–] NoosFraba@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Suppose it depends how much gas they each fire to keep the slop boiling

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Sadly we actually need power plants, the Data Centers though are trash.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

This will help fighting the global colding we've had going on… wait, something's off. Am I reading the charts upside down again?

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 32 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Once again I am shocked that you always have these big ass heat exchangers on these data centers but no talk of even trying to use some of the waste heat to offset the power use.

[–] mack@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 hours ago

my crazy ass idea since 2015:

let's install mini data centers on residential buildings:

  • use excess heat to get hot water for pavement heating in winter and get hot water for domestic usage
  • buildings get free high speed fiber
  • local edge servers
  • employ local people for maintenance

cons:

  • management hell, but if small teams get split locally in quarters/towns then I don't see problems
[–] PM_me_your_doggo@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Nebius is doing it in Finland

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Waste heat is high entropy alredy. You can't extract any meaningful energy out of it.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, famously we have never been able to do anything with heat energy....

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's not my fault you don't understand physics and think that all heat=free energy. You can't extract shit without big temperature difference.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah if only you had enough excess heat in one area to increase the local temperature of an already very hot place by 4 degrees.

[–] Kptkrunch@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

If you plug the numbers into the Carnot equation, it looks like the maximum theoretical efficiency of a thermoelectric generator or heat engine operating at that temperature gradient is about 0.75%. And, I could be wrong, but my assumption would be any attempt to reclaim that energy would slow its exchange and potentially bottleneck a cooling system to some extent.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The issue is you are using 4 degrees as the delta of temp, when that is the ambient area temp change. The very localized heat being generated on site (and already nicely conveyed in heat management systems) is going to be a lot more then 4. Also why would you be always using a thermometric generator? They are not know to be efficient.

[–] Kptkrunch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Good point about the local temperature delta.. I kind of lost sight of that in the discussion. But my understanding of that equation is it would be the maximum theoretical efficiency of any thermal generator as it represents an idealized heat engine.

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I mean good, we should do everything possible to make these data centers as unnefficient as they are unnecessary.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world -1 points 11 hours ago

4 degrees Fahrenheit is nothing. For all practical energy production puropses it's worthless

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 21 points 1 day ago (14 children)

They are wasteful on purpose. they could have closed circuit cooling systems where they condense the water from the vapor and reuse it. But they are a giant middle finger to all of us.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Nah, evaporation removes multiple times more heat than regular air cooling. It's because water has high specific heat

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Typical waste in the USA. I believe Sweden or Finland pump the heat out for residential use.

[–] BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz 8 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think the main problem of Phoenix is the lack of heating

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Use it to heat water for home use and a desert does become cool at night.

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago

You need hot water in Phoenix, don't you?

[–] freedom@lemy.lol 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 20 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Not only that... but Lake Tahoe is being abandoned by their power company to power data centers because its more profitable.

https://fortune.com/2026/05/12/lake-tahoe-data-center-49000-residents-power-source/

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] totoro@slrpnk.net 52 points 1 day ago (14 children)

"Data centers are inherently an important part of our society, and they're going to become even more necessary going forward,"

God, fuck this shit

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›