this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
248 points (96.6% liked)

Selfhosted

56957 readers
841 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Plex has announced a massive price increase on the service's Lifetime Plex Pass. On July 1, the lifetime subscription option will go from $249.99 to $749.99, an increase of 200%. The price hike will only apply to new subscribers, with no changes to monthly or annual subscription pricing.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 11 points 12 hours ago

The Jellyfin vs Plex thing always struck me as odd. As in - why are we holding JF to a different standard to (say) Immich, Syncthing, Pi-hole or any one of a thousand different programs people self host?

Yes, JF ships multi-user accounts and client apps etc. I get it, "multi-use" is implied, so the comparison isn't totally unfair. But there's a difference between 'this feature exists' and 'this is the primary purpose of the tool'.

The fact that you CAN share it externally doesn't mean everyone running JF is doing that, or that it should be the benchmark the whole project is judged by.

To me, self host means "I host it, myself" not "I host it and then pretend to be Netflix for family and friends". If that's the use case, then of course, Plex away.

It's cool that you CAN share JF externally, and it's cool that Plex does that differently / better. We shouldn't hold one to the standards of the other.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 15 points 13 hours ago

I “defend” plex against silly complaints, but jesus christ that is one giant leap for no gain. That’s stupid, no one will pay that - though I tend to think that’s the whole point.

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I got this on Black Friday many years ago for ~70 and despite the pass I am slowly moving over to Jellyfin. I really don't see how they came up with this valuation, seems like a last money squeeze before abandoning ship.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 8 points 13 hours ago

They don’t want lifetime licenses to sell, they want monthly subscriptions from everyone.

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 6 points 12 hours ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 124 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

A gentle reminder that Jellyfin exists to those thinking of alternatives.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 16 points 17 hours ago (7 children)

As someone who picked up lifetime for like $45 or whatever it was (I think a 50% off sale?) what must have been 15 years ago...

I run jellyfin. Its just a better experience IMO.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Mosfar@sh.itjust.works 32 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

For free (FOSS), and is way better than Plex

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

If you ignore the mostly horrendous UI, the security problems, the worse transcoding performance, the harder setup, the difficulty to access it remotely in a safe way,... Yeah sure, way better

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If you use it weekly it shouldn't be free to you, certainly if you use it more frequently than that. Give money to the projects you depend on or they will disappear.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 7 points 13 hours ago

Supporting software that you use by paying for it?

Ew.

/kidding

I’m a very happy lifetime membership owner and have zero problem with them removing features from the free version. Free doesn’t pay the bills unless you want to become the product.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 17 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Just out of interest as someone who has recently set up a Jellyfin server - what's the main "value add" of using Plex compared to Jellyfin?

It seems to do everything I want, so I'm not sure why people would pay for Plex over the FOSS version.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

Realistically the only advantage of Plex is being able to watch it over the internet without a VPN. Which means it makes it easier to get friends and family access to your server or to access it yourself from random smart tvs outside your house.

If you only watch at home or have a fire stick that you take with you to watch abroad or your friends/family members have one and can setup a VPN on it it's not needed.

[–] hedders@fedia.io 11 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

For me, the killer app for Plex is Plexamp, the music client. It's superb, and AFAIK Jellyfin doesn't really have an equivalent (there are 3P options, but they're lacking).

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

For me (Android) I have used these:

  • Finamp
  • Default Jellyfin App
  • Symfonium

And Symfonium can do many sources and is the moat powerful.
Finamp is neat but couldnt do casting to my soundbar via google cast

[–] chrizzly@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago

Symfonium with Jellyfin all the way!

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't try any of them because I additionally set up Navidrome to handle my music collection. But Fintunes, Jamfish and Finamp all look like great music players.

[–] fluffy@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I have a navidrome server. Nothing, really nothing comes close to Plexamp and its features … sadly … but they all ain’t bad and got the basic stuff right

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

What features do you like? Not trying to convince you, I'm just curious.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fluffy@feddit.org 4 points 11 hours ago

Plexamp is just far superior for music. It doesn’t even come close sadly … since I only use it for my music collection I simply prefer Plex … but only because I got lifetime a long time ago for 60 bucks or something …

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 12 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Are you accessing your media from outside of your network?

I have heard that you need to set up a VPN for Jellyfin to securely use your media library remotely. Plex handles all of that for me so that I don't need to deal with it.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 4 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

I have a jellyfin server set up that you access like this:

https://my.servername/jellyfin

Username and password is all you need aside from that. Apps for most platforms or access in a web browser.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

You do know that there are security issues with that, right? For example, if someone can guess your media files they can watch them https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Ease of use, and actual secure and usable external access.

Friends/family make an account and tell you their account name or email address, you invite them to your library and that’s it, they can watch/listen to your media on pretty much any device they have. No vpn needed.

Jellyfin is not meant to be exposed to the internet for remote viewing. It also doesn’t have a client on most devices people use to watch tv/movies.

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 7 points 13 hours ago

Huge disagree on the last part. Jellyfin has a bunch of Android, Roku, Google tv and PC clients. I struggle to think of a device me or my friends use that has a Plex client but not a Jellyfin one.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I've got a bunch of friends accessing my jellyfin server. It has clients for most devices now.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I didn’t say it’s not possible, I said it’s not secure and/or easy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 46 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I've gotten my money's worth out of the $74.99 I paid for Plex Pass Lifetime several years ago. If they ever get rid of my Plex Pass and try to say "Lifetime didn't actually mean Lifetime", I'll be gone.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

We've seen other companies pull this move by saying "lifetime" only applies to X version.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Except when I bought my lifetime it meant lifetime for the SERVICE, not the app...

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Did it. I don't remember it saying that. And I bought it around the same time as you since I paid the same price.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 42 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I know that whales exist, but seriously... Who is into self hosting but also into dropping $750 on a service that can end on a whim?

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

They dont want you to buy lifetime they want you to pay month to month.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 17 hours ago

Seems funny that they continue to increase the price as that value sharply declines with the limited life left in it.

[–] realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip 24 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

So basically, they just want to phase our the lifetime plan, but they know removing it outright would cause outrage so they "just" increase the price to massively lower interest and then say: "Well nobody wanted it so we removed the product".

I swear to god plex and the profiteering sons of bitches behind it can go fuck themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Anonymo@lemmy.world 30 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The company's blog post also described a number of improvements they plan to make

After you pay: "oops, we won't"

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

As a lifetime owner, the number of features they've deprecated is probably the worst part.

  • Photo support (luckily Immich came along)
  • Tidal integration (no idea if that was Plex or Tidal's decision)
  • Plugins (god forbid anyone add the functionality they keep removing)

It's close between that and the last app overhaul that removed a bunch of functionality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (3 children)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 43 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

From a purely profit-oriented perspective, no. They're setting up a pretext to eliminate the lifetime license plan due to a lack of interest. No sane person would pay that kind of lump sum for the service (and the insane ones will bring in triple the revenue), so they'll claim that there is no market for it. After that, they're free to crank up the periodic subscription prices.

Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by profiteering opportunism.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

it's their own product, who are they pretending to fool?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Not really. Their plan for a while now is to convert all to subscriptions and this is just their latest salvo. Next up is getting rid of it completely due to "no demand" and then kicking existing lifetime accounts to some static version that won't be supported.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

then why not just do that? who are they pretending to fool?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 16 points 21 hours ago

I never thought those leopards would eat MY face.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›