this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2026
0 points (NaN% liked)

Science

23826 readers
27 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Bruh it's not even a crank physics theory he's just saying the US is going to nuke everyone

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Oh boy is this another one of those "a scientist has an opinion about something outside their field and we're reporting on it as if they were any more qualified on the subject than a rando off the street" articles

[–] BabyTurtles@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doctors from the "Nobel Laureate Assembly for the Prevention of Nuclear War" are absolutely more qualified to report on the risks of nuclear war than a randomly picked person off the street.

He was clear that his estimation is "crude" and "not rigorous"; nuclear holocaust is uncharted territory and noone could truly be considered an expert. I think the average person wildly underestimates how close we are to mutually assured destruction. There's a natural human tendency towards optimism bias, but it's probably more likely we kill ourselves off as a species (ie "great filter" solution to the fermi paradox).

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net -1 points 1 month ago

In my defense, there was no non-paywalled version of the article posted when I made my comment

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net -1 points 1 month ago

Not even a real scientist. Dude is into string theory