this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
801 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84980 readers
3547 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago

“It was just a way for them to sound smart and I really hate that,” the CEO argued.

Aww, poor lil' fella, tried to juice his stock by selling AI as the second coming, and now he's mad that other CEO's are trying to juice their stock by trying to sell AI as the second coming.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 30 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, start telling them the truth. They were fired due to C-suite greed.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 hours ago

You mean lie to the workers? Hmmm...has that ever been tried?

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 points 5 hours ago

Am surprised AMD isn't doing BS like this (especially the CEO is the cousin of the CEO OF AMD)

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 23 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

“The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it — it is just too lazy,” Huang told Channel News Asia. “AI has just arrived, how is it possible they’re already losing jobs?”

Why are these guys so dumb, how did they get into positions of power? I think mostly just by being willing to stand up in front of a crowd and camera? AI hasn't just arrived, it's been improved over the last couple of years, and has become much more capable recently.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's not necessarily that they're dumb, it's that they think others are dumb enough to believe any old crap they say.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I genuinely think they're dumb, they have no sense of the fact that their greed and gatekeeping will bring about a serious shift in society. They should be trying to create new job opportunities and programs for people to innovate, yet we're gridlocked in a shit late-stage capitalist society where we can't actually do anything because of weird zoning laws and regulations.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

They don't care they have vacation homes on every continent, they really won't give a shit when the us descends into chaos. They already dont give a shit when a town of 10,000 in california gets their water shut off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 11 hours ago

Dunning-Kruger is a hell of a thing.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Oh, but "we are cutting workforce to invest in AI" sounds much better than "we are cutting workforce, because we struggling in current economy".

[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Or "we're cutting workforce because we're greedy sociopaths more inclined to appease share holders' ~~betting habits~~ interest than create a quality product that our longstanding workforce understands and can support, even though AI can't really'

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

That's the rub. They don't even say "we are cutting workforce to invest in AI", they say "we are cutting workforce because we've already replaced people with AI", which they have not. They're just such hype driven buffoons that they actually believe that LLMs are going to easily replace the people they just cut in their hubris.

Saying they've cut people to invest in AI is actually a little more honest because it admits that they haven't actually already succeeded.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

Yeah Jensen, what else am I supposed to do with AI but use it as a scapegoat?

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 32 points 16 hours ago

“Oh dear, they’re disliking us even more now, what do we do?!”

No shit Sherlock.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 23 points 15 hours ago
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 50 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 19 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Whoa. Nobody said that. Just stop paying them and let them figure out they've been let go instead of telling them. Less aggressive, more passive aggressive.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 18 hours ago

Just make sure nobody steals their stapler.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Where I work the leadership 100% tels people if they dont spend tokens they get canned. Theres dashboards and everything. I hate it but appreciate not being lied to, at least.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

My company leadership said the same to us.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I tokenmaxx as much as I can. Every report, design doc, or piece of code I prompt I keep bragging how it's written purely with AI. Nevermind that for each single-line fix I have to write a whole paragraph explaining how and where to apply the fix. And how for reports and docs I feel like a teacher grading a student that winged the test.

At this point I just find it amusing and try to see how far I can push it.

[–] lb_o@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Shiet.

Right at the fall of Soviet union the proverb emerged:

"They pretend they pay us money, and we pretend we work."

Same vibe, honestly.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I really dislike this dude more every day.

[–] mursejoy@lemmy.zip 27 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I remember 10 years ago when he cosplayed the leather jacket cool guy gamer CEO. Dude has always been a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He’s gross and every time he refers to people as “humans” it makes my skin crawl.

This is why people should put CEOs in a pedestal. The Xbox fan base did that for years with Phil Spencer after the Matrick era. In the end that cool guy persona lead to a legacy of buying studios and shutting them down when they didn’t meet internal metrics. Xbox was left in a dire state with his departure same as it was when he entered.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shamber@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

This guy is an abslout lying cunt, and always will be, same guy who's running a 5.2 trillion dollar company and was worried about their profits cause people are questioning their wretched AI schemes

[–] fastfomo7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 22 hours ago

Totally agree! They should start telling their works they are fired because of AI and NVIDIA.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 70 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

“How is it possible that AI became productive and useful only six months ago, and they were somehow laying people off two years ago because of AI?” he added. “It doesn’t make any sense.”

This is very telling. Jensen is pulling this "6 months" figure completely out of his ass here, but the reason why he wants that number to be true is because it moves the goalposts. If AI hasn't actually, really, been here for even a single fiscal year then it explains away everything. Suddenly the fact that it's made zero impact on productivity, that no one is making any profit on it, all of that becomes justified. "It's still early." You'll recall that this was the narrative around crypto too. Every time anyone criticized anything about it a herd of sheep would bleat "It's still early" even over a decade into the technology existing.

Investors are starting to ask serious questions about when these tools are actually going to start delivering greater productivity to their companies. Managers are starting to get the screws put to them about why their budgets are ballooning to cover subscription and token costs with nothing to show for it. Jensen can't have that, because AI is the whole reason why his company is on top of the world, so he's trying to reset the clock.

For the record, there's absolutely no evidence to suggest that AI has ever become productive and useful, but that wouldn't fit Jensen's narrative either. So instead he has to invent a world where AI is totally productive, 100% useful, just trust me! When did that happen? Oh, just now. That's, um... Yeah, that's why you didn't notice. It just happened, right before you walked in.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 33 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If AI hasn't actually, really, been here for even a single fiscal year then it explains away everything. Suddenly the fact that it's made zero impact on productivity, that no one is making any profit on it, all of that becomes justified. "It's still early."

I think you've nailed it.

I clearly remember 2023 being the year where AI and ChatGPT hit the mainstream. Looking back, nvidia's stock price had already doubled in the first half of 2023.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

I think they stopped telling workers anything a while back. They have LLMs for that. Exec messages have always been full of corporate lingo, canned legal language and artificial energy, so to be fair they have always been prime use cases for LLMs, but at least before you could still catch hints of their personality or a glimpse of humanity sometimes. Now that's all gone. They have become at least 10x more efficient with layoffs though.

[–] Tarambor@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Does he not want them to tell them the truth?

[–] Retiredtoflorida@lemmy.world 305 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Nvidia CEO Begs Execs to Stop Telling Workers They're Fired Because of AI, it's hurting Nvidia's stock price.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 175 points 1 day ago (14 children)

It's also a lie. LLMs can't replace a single worker, and most CEOs know that, they are using it as an excuse to cover up the consequences of mismanagement and/or increase short term profits at the expense of future growth.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago

But that's the only reason they even care about AI.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 134 points 1 day ago (23 children)

Honestly I find this darkly hilarious. The circlejerk is becoming more and more obvious. I’m going to be surprised if the bubble doesn’t pop within the next 6 months or so - definitely before the end of the year.

All it took for this to happen was:

  • skyrocketing energy prices
  • skyrocketing hardware prices
  • skyrocketing water usage
  • the effective priceout of PC/homelab enthusiasts and hobbyists which will probably destroy much of the community, and thus most of the consumer-oriented hardware manufacturers
  • turning the US economy into a house of cards
  • sharply accelerated enshitification of all major search engines (in the interest of pushing people to use LLM bullshit for no good reason, when a perfectly suitable and deterministic alternative already existed and was deployed at scale everywhere)
  • flagrantly ignoring licensing and usage terms for basically any and all open source software projects hosted anywhere on the internet
  • the hollowing out of software engineering as a discipline, the collapse of the hiring prospects of fresh grads/juniors because “ai can do that”, and the creation of a generational gap in staffing across huge swathes of the tech industry writ large
  • the (even more) accelerated enshitification of social media as it becomes a series of gigantic LLM bot farms talking to each other
  • we can go on

What a time to be alive.

Jensen can suck my Huang.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] user1234@fedinsfw.app 37 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Then stop firing them because of AI

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

They not firing them for AI. It's just a justification to fire because they over hired, atleast in the tech industry when money was cheap.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

I mean true in some cases maybe. But literally every company is looking to find ways to make the imaginary number in the stock market go up. Which means outsourcing jobs to places like India or Southeast Asia (and exploiting them), for 'contractors,' and then probably equipping them with AI so they can actually do something.

How McDonald's spent who knows how much money to put in different drive-thru speakers. They've tried multiple times to use call centers out of India so they don't have to pay someone local. I've lost count of how many different drive-throughs I've gone through and just got an AI agent taking my order. They will literally use AI so they don't have to pay somebody minimum wage.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 58 points 1 day ago

Not supposed to say the quiet part out loud

[–] homes@piefed.world 28 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

“I’m fucking our employees, but you’re forbidden from explaining that it’s because I’m milking their misery for my own enrichment!”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›