this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
127 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

84980 readers
3357 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 39 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

the consensus seems to be that adding instructions to code that sabotage other people’s work goes too far

Luckily, the LLM coding isnt people's work

[–] teft@piefed.social 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

the consensus seems to be that adding instructions to code that sabotage other people’s work goes too far

I mean, my thought would be "Don't fucking run code that you don't understand".

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 minutes ago

If we all followed that rule, we'd be using nothing more complex than an 8080.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 10 points 1 hour ago

It's the stolen work of other people.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 6 points 50 minutes ago

Hilarious. More of this please.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 22 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

lol at the pearl clutching from AI heads.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 3 points 39 minutes ago

The OG vibe coders.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

I love everything about this, other than the people butthurt that their free software doesn't like AI. I'll give the smallest amount of criticism that it was obfuscated initially, because that's just malware even if I think it's justified. By clearly stating what it does, then the onus is on the user to audit the code and modify as needed. I would love to see more of this type of action to become standard practice, but just deleting the test suite isn't quite painful enough for what I'd like to see.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago

mumble mumble "his code" mumble mumble "provided as is" mumble mumble.

Not all heroes wear capes. Based af.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

I’d say this is only fair game if you have a no-ai policy on the readme. Otherwise you’re just being a dick.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 21 minutes ago

I think its on the user of the bot for being a hack.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago

Heel yaw 👊