this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
264 points (76.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

42888 readers
306 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If all things were the same, but it was men who fell pregnant and gave birth, abortion clinics would be so standard they’d be on every corner, like McDonald’s. In fact, it’d be a sign of status to go to one.

Male 1: “I’m just off to the abortion clinic real quick.”

Male 2: “Oh nice, King. You’ve been busy.”

Male 1 leaves.

Male 3: “He’s so cool.”

(page 3) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ennof@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

If all things were the same, but it was men who fell pregnant and gave birth, all things would be different.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

https://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/Phil160,Fall02/thomson.htm -- ANYTHING less is denying the personhood of anyone that can get pregnant.

[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I kind of think there should be a constitutional amendment preventing legislatures from passing laws restricting the rights on a protected class. Like men can't vote on laws which take rights away from women. Or straight people can't pass laws banning LGBTQ material.

LOL, how do you suppose the protected class will fare if the provider class stops participating as a result?

Straight men can't vote on laws for women and LGBTQ people? Sure, then straight men will also refuse to extend public safety protections and social security nets they provide from their effort to the women and queer. How would that hold?

[–] tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

An interesting idea.

Maybe a whole host of homophobes would pretend to be gay to vote against something, but then realise they actually like this little “pretend” thing. They’d commit to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Shame women don't have the same drive and ingenuity

[–] tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That wasn’t my point. My point was that the world is run by men. Policymakers and politicians are, in general, men. And since abortion is about giving women freedom over their bodies and life decisions, (most) men don’t allow that. Therefore there’s a very unfair disconnect. My point was that if men were the target of anti-abortion policies, then such policies would by and large not exist.

ETA: As another commenter pointed out, perhaps statistically most men are pro-choice, but unfortunately in general the backwards few who go into and succeed in politics are the ones who make the call.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›