this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
578 points (96.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

43700 readers
574 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not only does this disincentivize HR from running fake vacancies or stringing multiple candidates on just to keep their options open, but it also solves the problem of unemployed people job-searching effectively working full-time for free. The fact that companies would have to pay to hire workers would mean they try to make the selection as short and effective as possible.

Edit: From the business POV:

  • Businesses would have a limited budget for hiring so would limit process to 10 applicants and would have to pick those randomly. Less time spent on interviewing but also might miss the ideal candidate. Although the difference would fall sharply with larger pools.
  • And 000s of people now stuck wo any appls at all (although better than writing fake, futile appls), and no money. Not enough jobs on the market would translate into not enough paying applications for them to be able to substitute unemployment benefits.
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

working full-time for free

Like, working full-time for free to find a job?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I already can't get an interview, this would make it impossible.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

hear hear. it should include any assesments to.

[–] ComradePenguin@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I agree 100%

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That would disincentivize HR from shortlisting candidates though.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago

Terrible idea that makes no sense. You're not doing work for them in an interview, you're trying to prove you are a good fit for them - and them for you.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I think a way forward is to make the government handle the hiring process. The companies put a fee into escrow, which is paid to the government if no hires are completed or retained.

The government interviews potential hires, anonymizes and DEIs, retains resumes and information from job seekers, creates the infrastructure for reviews to be left by people for a company's work conditions, and so forth. If a pattern of false jobs emerges, the government can prevent the company from issuing further offers for 3 or 4 months, with a heightened penalty for the escrow thereafter. If people are consistently hired and retained, the escrow penalty is reduced.

Corporations shouldn't be responsible for hiring, because they are strongly incentivized to do bullshit.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

IMHO funnelling anything through a central authority is destined to lead to bottlenecks and inflexibility. I could see something similar being achieved by heavily regulating the hiring process though. And possibly involving some sort of certified 3rd party* to guarantee impartiality, that isn't the government. (*A licensing model avoids the central authority bottleneck)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Maybe after the second round?

[–] Mearcfara@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I, too, hate job hunting, but I'm having a hard time seeing where unemployed people have to work full time for free, unless it's a working interview.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Generally, my out of town interviews include paid airfare, hotel and meals to do the interview, this has been the professional standard since the 1970s and before... Yeah, it's "unpaid time" but the expenses being borne by the company in the process are pretty obvious, and not insignificant.

Now, I can easily imagine today with AI HR screeners playing games of 20,000 questions before admitting you to a face-to-face round, yeah, that's gotta be annoying. One way to win those games is not to play, only deal with companies that respect your time - I understand all too well that sometimes there aren't any - but if they're wasting your time like that during the interview process, odds are high that they don't really have anything to offer anyway.

At more of a bottom-end job hunt, in high school I drove down the beach stopping in at every hotel filling out applications cold - low investment on my part. Four months later, I got a call back, apparently I was the only application on file.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Generally, my out of town interviews include paid airfare, hotel and meals to do the interview, this has been the professional standard since the 1970s and before... Yeah, it's "unpaid time" but the expenses being borne by the company in the process are pretty obvious, and not insignificant.

Oh, what industry were you in?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›