this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
134 points (90.9% liked)

Asklemmy

55519 readers
766 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

This is the grift economy baby! Everything is a gotcha.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Holy loaded question batman! Yeah I'm not gonna take this seriously with you just making these sweeping assertions with no evidence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago
[–] Uranus_Hz@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

The technologies themselves aren’t grifts, but grifters are notoriously “first-adopters” of new technologies.

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I'm hoping repairable tech is going to become more and more common. So far neither Framework nor Fairphone seem like grifters while some that came before didn't end up fulfilling their promises.

[–] jcr@jlai.lu 4 points 2 months ago
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

At this point, the only thing that wouldn't be a grift is a proof that P=NP, so that we can break all DRM effortlessly.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I wouldn’t say all “AI” was a grift. Machine learning is a useful tool, like a hammer, it’s just not a magic genie for everything. Always has been, always will be.

Same with blockchain, albeit in a much narrower niche. I do think it’s a terrible system for a widely-used currency, though.

Same with quantum computing. It’s a niche.

The pattern is that Tech Bros inflate something narrowly interesting into a “it’s going to ascend the human race if you give us enough money” FOMO thing.


…And, currently, the next target seems to be space travel.

Again, I emphasize. Very useful in certain niches, like science. Stupendously impractical outside of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FOSS isn't a "new and emergent technology". The OSI was founded in 1998. Richard Stallman started the FSF in the 80's.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

By that metric, llms aren't new either and the blockchain was invented in 2008.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›