this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
36 points (81.0% liked)

Asklemmy

54714 readers
813 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Ahmed@lemmy.zip -4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I know this example, but I want to see what people think from their own point of view. Like,Do things exist independently of our awareness of them?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PixeIOrange@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I have a similar question: can things exist if they have no physical connection at all to their surroundings? The double slit experiment shows that light seem to be information (if we pretend waves are information) until its forced (by observing) to exist. This works with photons, electrons, neutrons, atoms and even particles. So what if i take a cup and put it in a "magic box" that disconnects it from every "observing" system? Does it vanish? Is it gas if i open that box again?

[–] Goblinmancer@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
[–] sniggleboots@europe.pub 2 points 6 days ago

This isn't really an answer to your question, but I think it's more in the spirit of it than some of the actual answers you're getting;

Does something exist just because you observed it?

[–] vyitnoomyr@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Welcome back Heidegger

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Of course. I think there are many things that we haven't detected because we lack the instruments or even the concept they exist

Humans are constantly discovering life on Earth in places it was thought impossible, like deep underground or in very hot water around volcanic vents.

Certain cancers (HPV, EBV, HBV) have been discovered to be caused by viruses, not just randomly out of control cell replication.

IMO even astronomers suffer from short-sightedness. They tend to classify things in terms of our own little solar system when actually with billions of stars and trillions of planets there are likely very many astronomical objects and phenomenon that we have never observed or thought of.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yep. There are many billions of people around the world who don't know you exist yet you do. Although how sure are you that you exist?

[–] AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well at least one person is aware they exist, so anyone does not qualify

[–] helix@feddit.org 0 points 5 days ago

How do you know a rock isn't aware of its existence?

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 1 points 6 days ago

Things can and do.

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Most likely, yeah. All you have to do is find some object that you hadn't observed previously, which leaves evidence of having existed. You come across a snail moving across the sidewalk with a slime trail behind it. Either (1) the snail and slime trail blipped into existence just to serve your perception or (2) the snail was there making a trail prior to your having perceived it. You can reasonably assume the latter is more plausible.

You might enjoy Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. It's difficult but worthwhile. It sort of reconstructs epistemology/consciousness from the most basic fundamentals, starting with sense.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] waterbird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I am half awake and my brain for some reason decided that you had written β€˜political realism.’ I literally read it and was like β€˜huh, makes sense,’ before moving on and then abruptly stopping when my actual processing finally caught up, like β€˜wait, what?’

The more I sit here considering, the more it feels like political realism should really be a thing.

Looks like it actually is a thing!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realism_(international_relations)

I was thinking more about the β€˜reality’ which politicians present to people than states interacting with one another, but this is interesting too.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 6 days ago

At one point no one knew how gravity worked and yet the earth still orbited the sun

So, can something exist that is in no way quantium entangled with anything that comprises your experience of existence?

If you subscribe to the multiworld principle, basically anything potentially viable can and will.

Can something exist if you are not aware of it?

Most of reality. Human experience is quite limited.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The duality behind being both aware of something that can exist without your knowledge while also not being aware of its existence. Depending on if it's conception has been conceived first. Then it would exist without any knowledge and would count. But if you know it can exist than its already a possibility.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί