this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
410 points (99.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40432 readers
4348 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 2 points 51 minutes ago

Search tumblr. They have all the real transparent pngs for some reason.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

wait.

waitwaitwait.

i always merge my layers before saving, but is this why the jpegs with transparency work on websites but the pings don't? TIL. this is valuable shitposting news. I gotta switch over to pings exclusively

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 57 minutes ago) (1 children)

JPGs don't support transparency. Has to be PNG or GIF. WEBP also supports transparency, but it's got horrible compatibility with editors. There are other options that are overlooked for web like SVG, fantastic for a companies website logo.

Not sure what you are using. In Photoshop do not flatten the image. The program has a "save for web" and you can toggle transparency on and off. Better control than the "save as" and I think "save for screens".

More indepth breakdown.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

i was using gimp, but then i moved to paint dot net. i refuse to learn it well because shitposts aren't supposed to look good and i'm in the "cut the magazine with scissors and glue it together to make a collage" era of photoshop luddism.

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago) (1 children)

GIMPs got something like that using a plugin. Haven't used it myself. But heard it does the trick.

https://templatetoaster.com/tutorials/gimp-save-for-web/

I've taught this technical junk of print and web to graphic designers for close to 20 years. Trust me when I say not a lot of people understand the nuances and it's getting worse not better.

Not anyone's fault really a lot of this his hidden behind the scenes and you have to seek it out and actually care. Which doesn't come up often, until you need to optimize a websites load speed or print something extremely precise.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago)

pho to shop luddism.

emphasis on the F

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

EVERY. SINGLE. FUCKING. TIME.

FFS figure out how to filter this shit Google.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago

In GIMP, use the magic select tool to select the colors in the background and delete them. Your milage may vary depending on partial transparency in the foreground, and anti-aliasing (on any part of the image).

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Google has had a transparent image filter for decades

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Is this happening because people are screenshotting images? Fundamentally misunderstanding the reason for the background? It’s maddening

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 hours ago

It's probably a combo of a lot of things, like screenshotting, encoding issues, accidental conversion, etc, but at least for sites that advertise themselves as image repositories, I'm pretty sure it's to get you to actually visit the site. I've run into sites where the real image actually costs money to download, and ones where it's free and they're probably hoping for ad revenue from the page view.

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Gotta make sure it's rendered the same on IE5 still.

[–] AzuraTheSpellkissed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You might want to consider trauma therapy.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

first, with what money and second, they'll be retired before i make it to the top of their waiting list, so third why?

  1. healthcare providers'
  2. Fair point
  3. So IE5 stops haunting you/them

I'm sorry I wasn't completely transparent with you 😉