this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
248 points (97.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48600 readers
1292 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The "Dead Internet Theory" is a concept suggesting that the internet has largely been abandoned by humans and replaced by non-human activity. It posits that most online content, interactions, and engagement metrics are driven by bots, algorithms, and artificial intelligence, creating the illusion of a vibrant, human-driven web."

(page 2) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Bullshit.

Social media <> the internet.

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

There are way more bots now than back then, you could randomly be arguing with one somewhere. And have no idea. Users of the internet are mostly all bots now. More bots than humans.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There are also more people. Are streets not real if autonomous driving becomes a thing?

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

"Dead internet theory", there are not trillions of bots on the streets arguing yet...

[–] kbal@fedia.io 5 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

It's about on a par with the "birds aren't real" theory.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I do believe there's a very real risk of several related scenarios but it can be a good thing. Hear me out.

One of my favorite answers to the Fermi Paradox - why we don't encounter other life in the universe - is that civilization is a tool not a goal. This hypothesis implies that as soon as civilization empowers individuals enough to be self sustainable they retreat to their own space ships as cooperation and conflict are simply undesirable. If you can quantum print anything you want and you have an AI interface to educate, entertain you and be your safe gate to a shared network then why would you spend all that effort to group together?

If this hypothesis has any merit then we'd first see this happen on the digital space. Instead of interfacing to lemmy where there are straight up lies you need to verify yourself and conflicts you need to endure you can have a AI interface that abstracts all that away from you.
Is this dead internet? Kinda, at least of current understanding. Is this bad? Only if we risk capture by allowing manipulation of these interfaces. This is why libre software is critical for our future - we must trust out software if we delegate such responsibility to it.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 14 hours ago

Lemmy is defiantly a dead internet.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 13 hours ago

I don't think they the whole Internet has been abandoned yet, but bots keep growing as a percentage of traffic for various reasons. There is also a vested interest in more people to have bots than not.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

Lost but not wrong

[–] bungle_in_the_jungle@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Your friendly anonymous.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org -3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

for one, would it bother you if most accounts were bots? what difference would it make to you? would you still be on the internet?

for two, i'm honestly much more worried about paid influencers, newspapers, tv agencies with an agenda, hollywood, etc. instead of a few bots on the internet. for example lots of hollywood movies shape american culture much more than bot accounts do, yet we don't recognize that as problematic.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›