this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
396 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

85779 readers
4045 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/electricvehicles/p/2162853/usa-slate-s-new-electric-truck-will-cost-slightly-more-than-24950

Range is said to be 205 mi (330 km), higher than the original estimate. This price is for the basic truck. The SUV configuration is expected to be $5000 more.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Only 2 doors for the SUV is pretty wonky.

[–] prototonic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean, Blazers and Broncos have been around forever as 2-door SUVs, not a big issue there

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

well it's not a minivan

[–] Bread@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I only have a truck so i can tow a trailer. I wish they included some towing capacity and range numbers.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Cargo is 1500lbs. Towing is 2000lbs. I doubt... at the same time.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Those are numbers similar to a small truck in the 1980's. Im sure its fine unless youre one of these guys who NEEDS to haul four tons of cow shit to texas twice a week or whatever excuse is always given against a small electric vehicle.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The payload is actually pretty damn good for a truck of its size. Compare it to an S10, most are rated for 999 pounds in the bed. In which I have hauled cow shit, half a ton at a time, from one end of the county to the other. Thing is...I don't think the Slate can carry 1500 pounds of cow shit, the bed is too small.

Towing capacity is better than they initially said, earlier they quoted 1400, 2000 is lawnmower trailer territory. Compare that to the 5600 pound towing capacity of my S10.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And how often do you use the 5,600 pound towing capacity?

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Personally? Never have. I know folks with similar trucks who do so daily.

Here's my thing though: It's got weirdly high onboard payload capacity, but a small bed. So...how do you load it that heavy? At the same time, it has a low towing capacity, so it's not great for a contractor pulling a trailer. It's almost backwards in a way.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its not for contractors any more than its for people who think they need to tow four tons of cow shit to texas twice a week.

Contractors have trucks. People who want to traffic feces to texas have trucks. This truck isnt for them. Its for the person who just needs to grab stuff from the garden center or haul a couple of bikes to the lake without buying a $70,000 land yacht.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (10 children)

The range is now 205 miles, from a 63-kWh battery.

That's... Not that great. For comparison, the 2022 Chevy Bolt has a similar sized battery (65kWh) but about 260 miles of range. The weight's a little less than the slate at 3,600 lbs though it still wouldn't be enough to gap the difference in performance. There's either some heavy drag introduced by the truck or some drive system inefficiencies.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 13 points 3 days ago (26 children)

I don't understand the obsession with range. I agree that efficiency is important, but who is regularly driving a pickup truck 200 miles in a day?

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Rural people, as in the folks who actually have a use for pickups. As it so happens, it is about 200 miles round-trip to my nearest airport/major city, so if this were my vehicle, I'd have to take a charge break when picking someone up/dropping them off at the airport, or making a shopping run, or going to a concert/special event, or seeing a medical specialist. And I'm not even that far off the beaten path; I have family for whom the one-way drive to their nearest major city/airport is over 200mi. Plus if you're hauling anything, I'd imagine that range goes down quick.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›