This could be a Lotus. Lotus E-clipse or so
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
204 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
85745 readers
4363 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
To me it looks more like an iphone than a ferrari
Not a bad look IMHO, but yeah Ferraris tend to be distinct and this isn't really
Yeah I think it's a good looking car but it's clearly not a Ferrari.
Looks like a Volkswagen
If ford had made it it would be heralded. But it's just not Ferrari material.
Same energy
I think it looks alright, honestly.
Yes, if it was a Kia then it'd be great (at 1/8th the price, maximum).
Yeah, that's exactly it. It doesn't seem bad. It just seems out of place based on the price point and clientele.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Eh, they make boring looking SUVs, and a good chunk of their lineup is just expensive sporty ~~sedans~~ coupes. Not really surprised they’re making an EV, but it’s pretty ugly.
Guess they wanted a “unwanted stepchild” that couldn’t be associated with the design style of the rest of the fleet. They certainly succeeded with that.
Edit: apparently I’ve woken the Ferrari fans.
The Purosangue is an SUV. A sedan can be either two or four door for the record. You’ll have to forgive my casual use of “sedan”, it should be coupe or similar.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Just bc you used or “collaborated with Jonny Ivey” or whatever his name is. Doesn’t make me think this car is more aerodynamic - I highly doubt my iPhone is aerodynamic (except when I drop it accidentally¿)
The person they've got to get rid of is John Elkann
If I was him, I would too. That thing is a disgrace.
I’m confused, are people really butthurt because it doesn’t look exactly like every other car Ferrari has put out? This is literally not even the first car they’ve put out that doesn’t look like a classic Ferrari. They literally make a SUV now. Sometimes I feel like people are just upset whenever a company that traditionally makes ICE cars all of a sudden start making an EV.
Slapping their name on a dumpy SUV was a a stupid cash grab too. For me, the difference is that I expected it to be a dumpy cash grab to separate mcmansioners from their poolhouse money.
If Ferrari said "we're going to release a little electric, suburban grocery-getter", my response would have been "well that looks about right". Just like with the SUV.
When I hear Ferrari is releasing their "first electric car" my mind immediately starts thinking about what kind of little mean monster they could release with all that torque. I am disappointed when I see what looks like another dumpy cash grab, but this one is for missy mcmansion to take to her first day of college.
But then again, I care for speed alone. The scream of an ic engine is neat but to me, secondary. There are probably plenty of gasheads who are just pissy because "electricity is liberal" or something.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Aww I think it looks cool. I get that people don’t like change; but it’s not like they’ve stopped making the other ones. Feel bad for them; I don’t think its the best use of collective action to punish new ideas that are way down the totem pole of evil in this world.
Ferraris have soul, they're exciting, they look fast standing still. This thing looks fine as a standard passenger EV but it is no Ferrari. People are telling them exactly that, collectively.