this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
151 points (99.3% liked)

Electric Vehicles

2772 readers
271 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 18 minutes ago

Seriously Western EVs are not bad. They are just too expensive.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

I wonder if we tariff Chinese EVs on the difference between labor rates, what would that look like? And how much of the difference is something like socialized medicine? Most foreign labor doesn't have to spend a significant portion of their paycheck for health insurance.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 34 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm surprised "make our pickups and SUVs even bigger" wasn't suggested.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This child-murder truck is not child-murdery enough!

[–] lukaro@lemmy.zip 5 points 34 minutes ago

If you can't fuck em kill em right? /s

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

The company that can make an EV that gets you 100 miles range for $10,000 and can fit at least three people will become one of the dominant players.

[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk 1 points 19 minutes ago

Here in the UK you can pick up a secondhand Tesla with 60% depleted battery with a guranteed 100 miles range for £8,000. Less than 10 years old and with less than 40k miles.

Obviously everyone will call you a cunt but it's possible.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

My cargo e-bike could do that, assuming you can carry an extra battery and the passengers are kids. And for a lot less than $10K, too.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 33 minutes ago

It's annoying how the world, especially North America, is designed around vehicles that "can fit at lest three people" but are most frequently driven by a single person.

I love my ebike, and don't own a car, but even for short trips things would be more convenient with a car. The roads are designed for cars. Parking is designed for cars. Laws protect cars far more than bikes.

Maybe that will change. What happened in the Netherlands since the 1970s gives me hope. But, right now it's sad how the switch away from the gas-powered car seems to be toward electric cars rather than bikes, ebikes and mass transit.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 1 hour ago

100 miles when it is -25 or colder. Otherwise there are too many variables. Most days 100 miles is more than most people drive however most people I know often have a day where they do that much.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

The actual thing they need to do in order to compete is in-source parts manufacturing in order to take advantage of economies of scale... Like the Chinese EV manufacturers do.

Basically, toss out the Chicago school of economics thinking and go back to their roots as an all-things manufacturer. Ideally, they'd innovate as part of that by adopting new technologies like 3D printing to bring costs down and accelerate improvements.

I don't mean "3D printing for prototyping." They already do that. I mean, 3D print the final part. If it works for fucking rockets going into space, it can work for cars too. Especially electric vehicles which are much simpler to make.

[–] RandomStranger@piefed.social 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If you think 3D printing is advantageous for economies of scale, I have a bridge to sell you.

Rockets are the complete opposite of mass manufacturing.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 39 minutes ago

Yeah, 3d printing only makes economic sense if you're not doing mass production. It involves a lot of compromises.

Also, OP argues that it's better to be an "all-things manufacturer". Most of the time that isn't the most efficient way unless you have government assistance in some form. That might just be having patents or copyrights. BYD started as a battery company and has battery-related IP. Now they're China's leading company in patent filings, with over 13,000 of them.

Most of the time it's more efficient to specialize in something and buy parts from other specialists.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 1 points 22 minutes ago

idk shit about manufacturing, but can you do that at scale? I know my 3d printer is slow as fuck if I want it to make a good print.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Also when you pay pennies on the dollar for labor it cuts costs for EVs.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 17 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If they stopped adding features nobody asked for it would be a lot cheaper. Look at how Slate is doing.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They haven't delivered anything yet. They have pre-orders for now that will fill a year of production, but how much of that is people who buy anything new but won't buy again, vs sustainable people like this and so customers will keep coming.

Only time will tell.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Sure, they have simply demonstrated that there is demand.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Just like all the deposits on the cybertruck……oh wait.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

There was lots of demand for Cybertruck… mostly from fanboys and bootlickers though.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable that an established EV maker got 10x the reservations than a brand new manufacturer did, even on a product clearly designed for edgelords.