this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
181 points (94.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

41237 readers
932 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Other than them both being dickheads

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)
  1. Elon being an annoying jackass around everyone he meets has drawn most people, Trump included, to hate having him around.
  2. Several of Trump's policies that are unrelated to Elon, negatively effect him and/or Starlink and Tesla
  3. Trump isn't a traditional white-power nazi. He's just a racist, old American with zero wunderlust for any Reich, and isn't going as far as Elon hoped or would himself.
  4. Miscalculating this, Elon is now stuck in a horrible situation of being wrong about his orange would-be Hitler, and the moat he's dug himself between him, his companies and leftists who otherwise would consume his products.
  5. Doge didn't find or accomplish anything but dismantle parts of our government that then either had to be band-aided back together by the closest Democrats or Republicans for better and worse.

Aside from "winning" the election, they've both done nothing but step on eachother's feet and disappoint one another. The levee broke.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Trump thinks Miller Light tastes great, Musk thinks it's less filling.

[–] Buske@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

There is no fall out. They both are still getting exactly what they want. It is a ploy.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 12 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 18 hours ago

The fact that he was able to get this in the first people is lol

This is such a shit way to do industrial policy. Just hands out no conditions. China gonna teach US a lesson, gonna hurt. A generation of malinvestments across key industries. Clown capitalism.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Have you heard the Tenacious D song “Two Kings”?

[–] LemmiChanga@programming.dev 5 points 20 hours ago

“We don’t have to cognitive capacity to lead… ok we’ll do it”

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 58 points 1 day ago (13 children)

I think Musk is stupider than people realize. He's a true believer in his grandpa's technocracy movement (plus eugenics), and so he thought "if I was in control for just a few weeks everyone would realize they should just let me run the world"

Then, he got practically unlimited power, and everyone got mad at him. He seemed genuinely surprised that people weren't praising him for his sacrifices (such as selflessly condemning hundreds of thousands of people to death)

Then he showed he was useless at buying elections, and the right dropped him

He followed Trump around for a while quietly, probably spending most of it in a k-hole. Then Trump officially broke up with him, even if he glazed Elon on the way out

Then the narcissism kicked back in. Maybe his "friends" rubbed it in, maybe his dad called him a disappointment who fumbled the chance of a lifetime, maybe the threat of legal ramifications made him bitch out - but whatever happened, Elon woke up one day and decided "it wasn't my fault, Trump and Co fucked me"

I think Elon is actually concerned about the bill to some degree, because it does stretch our debt and spending to levels that could potentially pop the global economy. I think he does feel disrespected that his work at Doge is being rolled back and everyone is distancing themselves from him. I think he is upset that he spent all this money to buy the presidency, and got a bad ROI

But ultimately, Elon is a fucking idiot with a huge ego. He didn't understand what game he was playing, and so when he lost he started blaming others

And it's beautiful. Possibly the greatest crash out in history

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

The bill ends the carbon offset income that's the largest portion of Tesla's income. Combined with their sales being in the toilet because everybody hates him, and the company very well may not survive.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

He thought he was playing the game against Trump who is in fact a moron. But then he found out there are smart powerful evil people actually pulling the strings who have more power than he could imagine. He got fucking set up and rolled over by people as cunning as he perceived himself to be. Self reflection is not something his brain is capable of so he's just lashing out lol. He's a bozo and his companies are going to 0.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 19 hours ago

Yeah I really hope he goes after Vought and the truly evil people next. It'd be glorious to watch them all fight and get ripped apart so they can't harm anyone else.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] percent@infosec.pub 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun fact: This isn't the first time they've worked together and broke up. IIRC, Trump choose Musk for some advisory role during his first term (I don't remember what, specifically). Musk resigned because Trump withdrew from the Paris Climate Accord.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Publicly, Elon said Trump’s bill was full of pork and would increase spending and debt by a lot.

Voters on the right were already waking up to how shitty Trump’s bill was, and Musk just used his megaphone to let even more of Trump’s base know that it sucked.

Privately, Musk is probably pissed that Trump’s bill didn’t help his companies. These are two greedy assholes. It all comes down to money and ego at the end of the day.

[–] LadyButterfly@lazysoci.al 16 points 1 day ago (7 children)

That's a really good explanation thanks! Can you ELI5 why the bill sucked?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The bill give massive tax cuts to the extremely rich, and it attempts to pay for part of that by:

  • kicking many low income and disabled people off of federally funded health insurance
  • closes poor rural hospitals that depend on Medicaid money
  • cutting subsidies for manufacturing jobs that make emerging green tech, like EVs
  • food and child care assistance will disappear for many poor families.
  • and there is a bunch of weird little sneaky things hidden in it that people hope don’t get noticed because the bill is 200+ pages

When you do the math, the rich will get a lot of money, the very poor will have lose money, the and middle class will break even but many will be put on unemployment.

And it costs an extra $4,000,000,000,000, which is fucking bonkers.

[–] LadyButterfly@lazysoci.al 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This sounds ludicrously bad. What are the perceived benefits? How is it being sold to peopl? It sounds abysmal

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

From the people I know, who do depend on these programs and like Trump, they don't believe they will have their benefits reduced. The think the other people, "taking advantage" of the system will be kicked off. It's being sold as reducing fraud and abuse. The right-wing has been pushing this framing for decades, and many people have bought into it.

[–] LadyButterfly@lazysoci.al 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yes that's true. And most people agree fraudulently claiming benefits is wrong

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 1 points 1 minute ago

Yeah, that's how they sell it. Problem is, studies have shown the fraud in these programs isn't much of an expense, in the broader context. And, Trump has granted clemency to Lawrence Duran, who stole $205M from Medicare, which tells you they don't really care about that. These programs are actually pretty efficient, and spending funds to investigate small-time fraud would often cost more than just letting it happen. It's not like tons of people wish to be on our shitty social programs that don't even supply enough help for the people that absolutely need it.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A lot of people still buy into trickle down economics despite consistently not working for the several decades we have tried it and reflexively support tax cuts for the wealthy. A lot of those same people also think that kicking people off of what they consider to be "welfare" will somehow magically result in those people quickly becoming employed, thinking that the reason they aren't employed is because they aren't facing serious enough consequences for unemployment.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

A lot of people still buy into trickle down economics despite consistently not working for the several decades we have tried it

It has literally never worked, even over a century ago when it was called "horse and sparrow economics," and it never will.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess the big argument is that giving a bunch of money to the wealthy will stimulate the economy. Although, that’s an argument that many nations, including the US, have 50 years of data on, and there isn’t much to support that argument. Trickle down economics hasn’t been shown to work.

I also, if you’re in the camp that doesn’t believe in climate change and or thinks poor people are poor because of character flaws, then you probably like this thing. Or if you’re a wealthy person who donated a lot of money to republican politicians, you probably like this thing, because it’s a return on investment.

It’s not particularly great. Many people on the right only voted for it because they’re afraid Trump will primary them, and end their political careers, if they oppose.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Although, that’s an argument that many nations, including the US, have 50 years of data on, and there ~~isn’t much~~ is nothing to support that argument. Trickle down economics ~~hasn’t been shown to work~~ has been conclusively shown to not work.

FTFY

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Musk realized Tesla couldn't do the rebate scams if the bill passed

[–] timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Bigger than that, I think Musk finally realized that Trump only holds up his end of deals as long as it's advantageous for him. The rest of us have known that for as long as we've known Trump, but hey, being a totally legit super genius has its downsides, right? Anyways, Trump promised him a buffet of corruption, then got cold feet when he saw musks appetite. Even more than that, they're two self-appointed kings of their own worlds, both with the emotional intelligence/maturity of a very traumatized teenager. With their levels of obvious insecurity, their arrangement was never going to work. I'm just glad their break up is as juicy as I thought it would be. :)

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think they're just two overly inflated narcissists who's goals briefly aligned, and now they don't so much.

[–] timmy_dean_sausage@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I think that's likely all it was. But, I also think it's a little too convenient that Trump is done with Elon now that the dirty work has been done to line up manufactured support for their billionaire tax break bill. At risk of getting a little conspiratorial, it's possible Trumps team actually planned to use Elon to do all the worst damage so they could cut him loose, after the fact, then blame him for the worst of the fallout.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Wow. Reading the comments, it's amazing how uninformed people here are.

Read the news, folks.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

What?! Only fools believe what the professional journalists say! Dintcha hear? It’s all fake news! The only real news is the stuff you see online, in random and especially backwater Internet forums, because why would some random, anonymous person lie or have things wrongly worked out? Trust in the obscure and unverifiable!

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

You ever see what happens when you put two narcissists in the same room? This is what happens.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Because autocracy cannot sustain conflict of ideas. It was just a matter of time as every political scientist said 6 months ago.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

Trump wasn't giving him the policies/legislation he was asking for that would put his businesses at an advantage. Additionally Elon was unhappy with the tarrifs. Lastly, they both have large and delicate egos.

[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's also possible that this is just political theater designed to distract people

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

You're traumatized and overthinking it. They are not that smart. A good thing is happening. Enjoy it.

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like you don't call the President of the United States a kid fucker to millions of people unless you're serious. It's possible but it seems pretty unlikely

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm putting 50/50 odds that it's an intentional, theatrical distraction from other more important things that are going on, or it's just the inevitable outcome of two malignant narcissist sociopaths being in the same room together too often. If they quickly kiss and make up I'll lean more towards the former than the latter.

[–] LadyButterfly@lazysoci.al 33 points 1 day ago

I've found criminals and high up business people are never friends, just friends when it suits them. They'll have HUGE fallouts then be ok with each other when they need each other. Just IME

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago

While I am sure there are real, specific reasons that can be pointed to as "the reason," the real answer is that you can't put two narcissists in a room together and tell them they're on the same team. This always was the only possible outcome.

load more comments
view more: next ›