Texas

2046 readers
13 users here now

A community for news, current events, and overall topics regarding the state of Texas

Other Texas/US Lemmy Communties to follow

Sports

BYPASSING PAYWALLS

Rules (Subject to Change)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
1
Welcome Y'all (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world to c/texas@lemmy.world
 
 

Here's to the beginning of this community. I'll be posting news articles and such that I come across pertaining to Texas. Please read the rules in the sidebar and be kind to your neighbors!

2
 
 
S.B. No. 2420

AN ACT relating to the regulation of platforms for the sale and distribution of software applications for mobile devices. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Subtitle C, Title 5, Business & Commerce Code, is amended by adding Chapter 121 to read as follows: CHAPTER 121. SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 121.001. SHORT TITLE. This chapter may be cited as the App Store Accountability Act. Sec. 121.002. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter: (1) "Age category" means information collected by the owner of an app store to designate a user based on the age categories described by Section 121.021(b). (2) "App store" means a publicly available Internet website, software application, or other electronic service that distributes software applications from the owner or developer of a software application to the user of a mobile device. (3) "Minor" means a child who is younger than 18 years of age who has not had the disabilities of minority removed for general purposes. (4) "Mobile device" means a portable, wireless electronic device, including a tablet or smartphone, capable of transmitting, receiving, processing, and storing information wirelessly that runs an operating system designed to manage hardware resources and perform common services for software applications on handheld electronic devices. (5) "Personal data" means any information, including sensitive data, that is linked or reasonably linkable to an identified or identifiable individual. The term includes pseudonymous data when the data is used by a person who processes or determines the purpose and means of processing the data in conjunction with additional information that reasonably links the data to an identified or identifiable individual. The term does not include deidentified data or publicly available information. SUBCHAPTER B. DUTIES OF APP STORES Sec. 121.021. DUTY TO VERIFY AGE OF USER; AGE CATEGORIES. (a) When an individual in this state creates an account with an app store, the owner of the app store shall use a commercially reasonable method of verification to verify the individual's age category under Subsection (b). (b) The owner of an app store shall use the following age categories for assigning a designation: (1) an individual who is younger than 13 years of age is considered a "child"; (2) an individual who is at least 13 years of age but younger than 16 years of age is considered a "younger teenager"; (3) an individual who is at least 16 years of age but younger than 18 years of age is considered an "older teenager"; and (4) an individual who is at least 18 years of age is considered an "adult." Sec. 121.022. PARENTAL CONSENT REQUIRED. (a) If the owner of the app store determines under Section 121.021 that an individual is a minor who belongs to an age category that is not "adult," the owner shall require that the minor's account be affiliated with a parent account belonging to the minor's parent or guardian. (b) For an account to be affiliated with a minor's account as a parent account, the owner of an app store must use a commercially reasonable method to verify that the account belongs to an individual who: (1) the owner of the app store has verified belongs to the age category of "adult" under Section 121.021; and (2) has legal authority to make a decision on behalf of the minor with whose account the individual is seeking affiliation. (c) A parent account may be affiliated with multiple minors' accounts. (d) Except as provided by this section, the owner of an app store must obtain consent from the minor's parent or guardian through the parent account affiliated with the minor's account before allowing the minor to: (1) download a software application; (2) purchase a software application; or (3) make a purchase in or using a software application. (e) The owner of an app store must: (1) obtain consent for each individual download or purchase sought by the minor; and (2) notify the developer of each applicable software application if a minor's parent or guardian revokes consent through a parent account. (f) To obtain consent from a minor's parent or guardian under Subsection (d), the owner of an app store may use any reasonable means to: (1) disclose to the parent or guardian: (A) the specific software application or purchase for which consent is sought; (B) the rating under Section 121.052 assigned to the software application or purchase; (C) the specific content or other elements that led to the rating assigned under Section 121.052; (D) the nature of any collection, use, or distribution of personal data that would occur because of the software application or purchase; and (E) any measures taken by the developer of the software application or purchase to protect the personal data of users; (2) give the parent or guardian a clear choice to give or withhold consent for the download or purchase; and (3) ensure that the consent is given: (A) by the parent or guardian; and (B) through the account affiliated with a minor's account under Subsection (a). (g) If a software developer provides the owner of an app store with notice of a change under Section 121.053, the owner of the app store shall: (1) notify any individual who has given consent under this section for a minor's use or purchase relating to a previous version of the changed software application; and (2) obtain consent from the individual for the minor's continued use or purchase of the software application. (h) The owner of an app store is not required to obtain consent from a minor's parent or guardian for: (1) the download of a software application that: (A) provides a user with direct access to emergency services, including: (i) 9-1-1 emergency services; (ii) a crisis hotline; or (iii) an emergency assistance service that is legally available to a minor; (B) limits data collection to information: (i) collected in compliance with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (15 U.S.C. Section 6501 et seq.); and (ii) necessary for the provision of emergency services; (C) allows a user to access and use the software application without requiring the user to create an account with the software application; and (D) is operated by or in partnership with: (i) a governmental entity; (ii) a nonprofit organization; or (iii) an authorized emergency service provider; or (2) the purchase or download of a software application that is operated by or in partnership with a nonprofit organization that: (A) develops, sponsors, or administers a standardized test used for purposes of admission to or class placement in a postsecondary educational institution or a program within a postsecondary educational institution; and (B) is subject to Subchapter D, Chapter 32, Education Code. Sec. 121.023. DISPLAY OF AGE RATING FOR SOFTWARE APPLICATION. (a) If the owner of an app store that operates in this state has a mechanism for displaying an age rating or other content notice, the owner shall: (1) make available to users an explanation of the mechanism; and (2) display for each software application available for download and purchase on the app store the age rating and other content notice. (b) If the owner of an app store that operates in this state does not have a mechanism for displaying an age rating or other content notice, the owner shall display for each software application available for download and purchase on the app store: (1) the rating under Section 121.052 assigned to the software application; and (2) the specific content or other elements that led to the rating assigned under Section 121.052. (c) The information displayed under this section must be clear, accurate, and conspicuous. Sec. 121.024. INFORMATION FOR SOFTWARE APPLICATION DEVELOPERS. The owner of an app store that operates in this state shall, using a commercially available method, allow the developer of a software application to access current information related to: (1) the age category assigned to each user under Section 121.021(b); and (2) whether consent has been obtained for each minor user under Section 121.022. Sec. 121.025. PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA. The owner of an app store that operates in this state shall protect the personal data of users by: (1) limiting the collection and processing of personal data to the minimum amount necessary for: (A) verifying the age of an individual; (B) obtaining consent under Section 121.022; and (C) maintaining compliance records; and (2) transmitting personal data using industry-standard encryption protocols that ensure data integrity and confidentiality. Sec. 121.026. VIOLATION. (a) The owner of an app store that operates in this state violates this subchapter if the owner: (1) enforces a contract or a provision of a terms of service agreement against a minor that the minor entered into or agreed to without consent under Section 121.022; (2) knowingly misrepresents information disclosed under Section 121.022(f)(1); (3) obtains a blanket consent to authorize multiple downloads or purchases; or (4) shares or discloses personal data obtained for purposes of Section 121.021, except as required by Section 121.024 or other law. (b) The owner of an app store is not liable for a violation of Section 121.021 or 121.022 if the owner of the app store: (1) uses widely adopted industry standards to: (A) verify the age of each user as required by Section 121.021; and (B) obtain parental consent as required by Section 121.022; and (2) applies those standards consistently and in good faith. Sec. 121.027. CONSTRUCTION OF SUBCHAPTER. Nothing in this subchapter may be construed to: (1) prevent the owner of an app store that operates in this state from taking reasonable measures to block, detect, or prevent the distribution of: (A) obscene material, as that term is defined by Section 43.21, Penal Code; or (B) other material that may be harmful to minors; (2) require the owner of an app store that operates in this state to disclose a user's personal data to the developer of a software application except as provided by this subchapter; (3) allow the owner of an app store that operates in this state to use a measure required by this chapter in a manner that is arbitrary, capricious, anticompetitive, or unlawful; (4) block or filter spam; (5) prevent criminal activity; or (6) protect the security of an app store or software application. SUBCHAPTER C. DUTIES OF SOFTWARE APPLICATION DEVELOPERS Sec. 121.051. APPLICABILITY OF SUBCHAPTER. This subchapter applies only to the developer of a software application that the developer makes available to users in this state through an app store. Sec. 121.052. DESIGNATION OF AGE RATING. (a) The developer of a software application shall assign to each software application and to each purchase that can be made through the software application an age rating based on the age categories described by Section 121.021(b). (b) The developer of a software application shall provide to each app store through which the developer makes the software application available: (1) each rating assigned under Subsection (a); and (2) the specific content or other elements that led to each rating provided under Subdivision (1). Sec. 121.053. CHANGES TO SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS. (a) The developer of a software application shall provide notice to each app store through which the developer makes the software application available before making any significant change to the terms of service or privacy policy of the software application. (b) For purposes of this section, a change is significant if it: (1) changes the type or category of personal data collected, stored, or shared by the developer; (2) affects or changes the rating assigned to the software application under Section 121.052 or the content or elements that led to that rating; (3) adds new monetization features to the software application, including: (A) new opportunities to make a purchase in or using the software application; or (B) new advertisements in the software application; or (4) materially changes the functionality or user experience of the software application. Sec. 121.054. AGE VERIFICATION. (a) The developer of a software application shall create and implement a system to use information received under Section 121.024 to verify: (1) for each user of the software application, the age category assigned to that user under Section 121.021(b); and (2) for each minor user of the software application, whether consent has been obtained under Section 121.022. (b) The developer of a software application shall use information received from the owner of an app store under Section 121.024 to perform the verification required by this section. Sec. 121.055. USE OF PERSONAL DATA. (a) The developer of a software application may use personal data provided to the developer under Section 121.024 only to: (1) enforce restrictions and protections on the software application related to age; (2) ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and (3) implement safety-related features and default settings. (b) The developer of a software application shall delete personal data provided by the owner of an app store under Section 121.024 on completion of the verification required by Section 121.054. (c) Notwithstanding Subsection (a), nothing in this chapter relieves a social media platform from doing age verification as required by law. Sec. 121.056. VIOLATION. (a) Except as provided by this section, the developer of a software application violates this subchapter if the developer: (1) enforces a contract or a provision of a terms of service agreement against a minor that the minor entered into or agreed to without consent under Section 121.054; (2) knowingly misrepresents an age rating or reason for that rating under Section 121.052; or (3) shares or discloses the personal data of a user that was acquired under this subchapter. (b) The developer of a software application is not liable for a violation of Section 121.052 if the software developer: (1) uses widely adopted industry standards to determine the rating and specific content required by this section; and (2) applies those standards consistently and in good faith. (c) The developer of a software application is not liable for a violation of Section 121.054 if the software developer: (1) relied in good faith on age category and consent information received from the owner of an app store; and (2) otherwise complied with the requirements of this section. SUBCHAPTER D. ENFORCEMENT Sec. 121.101. DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICE. A violation of this chapter constitutes a deceptive trade practice in addition to the practices described by Subchapter E, Chapter 17, and is actionable under that subchapter. Sec. 121.102. CUMULATIVE REMEDIES. The remedies provided by this chapter are not exclusive and are in addition to any other action or remedy provided by law. SECTION 2. It is the intent of the legislature that every provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word in this Act, and every application of the provisions in this Act to every person, group of persons, or circumstances, is severable from each other. If any application of any provision in this Act to any person, group of persons, or circumstances is found by a court to be invalid for any reason, the remaining applications of that provision to all other persons and circumstances shall be severed and may not be affected. SECTION 3. This Act takes effect January 1, 2026.

______________________________ 	______________________________
   President of the Senate 	Speaker of the House     

       I hereby certify that S.B. No. 2420 passed the Senate on
April 16, 2025, by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 1; and that
the Senate concurred in House amendments on May 14, 2025, by the
following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 1.
  

______________________________
Secretary of the Senate    

       I hereby certify that S.B. No. 2420 passed the House, with
amendments, on May 9, 2025, by the following vote: Yeas 120,
Nays 9, three present not voting.
  

______________________________
Chief Clerk of the House   

  

Approved:
  
______________________________ 
            Date
  
  
______________________________ 
          Governor
3
 
 
4
5
6
 
 

Gov. Greg Abbott is calling on the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to enforce the removal of “any and all political ideologies” from Texas streets, warning that cities who do not comply will “face consequences.” Non-standard surface markings, signage and signals that “do not directly support traffic control or safety” are prohibited, according to a Wednesday news release from Abbott’s office.

archive.is

7
8
 
 
9
10
11
12
 
 

More background on the subject can be found on Louis Rossmann's video a couple days before this meeting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kkAo9faois

13
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/36397135

Multiple people have been shot at the Dallas ICE field office, according to a law enforcement source.

14
 
 
15
16
17
 
 

elpasotimes.com ICE report finds 60 violations in 50 days at Fort Bliss migrant facility in El Paso, Texas Kristian Jaime ~3 minutes

A scathing report by Immigration and Customs Enforcement inspectors has put the Fort Bliss immigration detention center in the crosshairs, claiming a bevy of violations in the facility.

Camp East Montana was found to have no less than 60 violations in 50 days as plans continue for its expansion, the Washington Post reported. According to inspections legally mandated by ICE, detainees were subjected to conditions that violated at least 60 federal standards for immigrant detention.

The inspections found:

The facility failed to properly monitor and treat some detainees’ medical conditions
Lacked basic procedures for keeping guards and detainees safe
Did not provide many detainees, for weeks, a way to contact lawyers, learn about their cases or file complaints

As of Aug. 28 following the visit by Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-TX, an estimated 1,400 detainees are being held in the facility, with the Washington Post reporting it was intended to hold up to 2,700 migrants by this point in the month and as many as 5,000 by the end of the year. A prototype of future construction A new migrant detention center located at the Fort Bliss U.S. Army Post is photographed on Aug. 2, 2025. It is reported to be the largest detention center for migrants in the United States.

Officials have publicly described Camp East Montana as the prototype for a new breed of large-scale holding facilities that will help ICE achieve its goal of doubling the nation’s detention capacity by the end of the year.

Efforts by the El Paso Times to reach ICE spokeswoman Leticia Zamarripa regarding violations and the current number of detainees have yielded no response, even after several weeks.

This account of Camp East Montana’s first 50 days — from when the contract was awarded to the final day of the ICE inspection on Sept. 5 — is based on internal ICE documents, an interview with detainees, interviews with individuals who have visited the site, and satellite photos showing its construction.

Acquisition Logistics LLC was selected to oversee the $1.2 billion contract for the construction and operation of the facility. The small business is registered to the Virginia home of Ken Wagner, the company’s 77-year-old owner.

The El Paso Times also contacted the company and was told they would not comment on any government contracts they currently have.

Federal law permits members of Congress to enter “any facility operated by or for the Department of Homeland Security used to detain or otherwise house aliens.” Escobar noted she was following the agency’s own guidelines, which require seven days notice for such visits. ICE confirmed her request met that requirement, but said it was not allowing visits until “construction is complete” and did not admit her until two weeks after her initial request.

18
 
 

Senate Bill 17 prohibits many people and businesses from China, Iran, Russia and North Korea from buying most types of real estate

19
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35745805

DALLAS (AP) — One of the nation’s first doctors accused of illegally providing care to transgender youth under GOP-led bans was found to have not violated the law, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office says, nearly a year after the state sued the physician.

Dr. Hector Granados, a pediatric endocrinologist in El Paso, was called a “scofflaw” last year by Paxton’s office in a lawsuit that accused him of falsifying medical records and violating a Texas ban that took effect in 2023. More than two dozen states have prohibitions on gender-affirming care for transgender youth, but Texas was the first to bring cases against doctors, filing lawsuits against Granados and two other providers.

The cases against the other doctors, both in Dallas, remain ongoing. But Paxton’s office quietly withdrew its lawsuit last week against Granados, saying in a statement that “no legal violations were found” following a “review of the evidence and Granados’ complete medical records.”

Granados, who says Paxton’s office never reached out before suing him last October, said he wished the state had first let him show he had stopped providing gender-affirming care for youth before the law took effect.

“It was just out and then we had to do everything afterwards,” Granados said in an interview.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June that states can ban gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, and at least 27 states have adopted laws restricting or banning the care. Although those accused of violating bans face criminal charges in some states, they do not in Texas, where the punishments instead expose providers to steep fines and revocation of their medical licenses.

Paxton’s office said in a statement that Dr. May Lau and Dr. M. Brett Cooper, the other accused physicians, will “face justice for hurting Texas kids both physically and mentally.” Their attorneys didn’t offer comment Wednesday.

20
 
 

Thomas Alter is the second professor in the state to be terminated for allegedly violating university policy after a video was posted on social media.

A Texas State University professor was fired on Wednesday after he was accused of inciting violence in a video of him speaking at a socialism conference posted on social media.

In a video circulated on social media platform X, Thomas Alter, an associate history professor, can be seen talking during a Zoom meeting as part of the Revolutionary Socialism Conference, an online meeting organized by several socialist groups. During his talk, Alter explains how he feels socialists in the United States can organize an effective party, and criticizes the Democratic Party, the Democratic Socialists of America, China and anarchists for their methods of organization.

The video circulated on X cuts one portion of Alter’s speech in half, during which he criticized “insurrectional anarchists” for their method of protesting, urging organization into a party to better reach people. In the full speech posted on YouTube, he notes that some anarchists have faced jail time for their methods of protest, praising their efforts but questioning whether they can achieve their goals.

“While their actions are laudable, it should be asked, to what purpose do they serve?” Alter said during his speech, which is not included in the video posted on X. The second portion of his statement is included. “Without organization, how can anyone expect to overthrow the most bloodthirsty, profit-driven, mad organization in the history of the world — that of the United States?”

Texas State University President Kelly Damphousse announced Alter was fired after the university was made aware of comments he made at the conference, which Damphousse said constituted “serious professional and personal misconduct.” Damphousse said in the statement the university thoroughly reviewed the video posted publicly for their assessment. Damphousse did not specify what comment Alter made that violated university policy.

“Conduct that advocates for inciting violence is directly contrary to the values of Texas State University,” Damphousse said. “I cannot and will not tolerate such behavior.”

Texas State University System Chancellor Brian McCall commended Alter’s firing in a post on X, and also said the university would not “tolerate conduct by any employee intended to incite violence.” McCall specifically pointed to Alter’s claim about overthrowing the United States as misconduct.

“Video recordings made public this week in which a Texas State University professor advocated for the overthrow of our government are inconsistent with our shared values and demonstrate egregious personal and professional misconduct,” McCall said in the statement.

21
22
23
1
Still Messing With Big Tex (intlantifadefence.wordpress.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Five@slrpnk.net to c/texas@lemmy.world
24
 
 

Texas’ booming hemp industry has survived another effort to ban intoxicating products.

Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s push to prohibit hemp-derived THC has died for the year after the Legislature adjourned its second special session Wednesday night.

“After long discussions last night between the Governor, Speaker, and me on THC, and continued hours of discussion today, we were not able to come to a resolution,” Patrick said Wednesday night on X.

25
 
 

Currently, any Texas voter can cast a ballot in GOP primaries. The party wants to limit eligibility to registered members.

The Republican Party of Texas filed a lawsuit against Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson on Thursday in a bid to restrict participation in the GOP’s primary elections to only voters registered with the party.

The lawsuit, filed in federal district court, claims Texas’ open primaries violate the Republican Party’s First Amendment associational rights to choose party leaders. The GOP said in its suit that it would prefer the Legislature to pass a law allowing only registered party members to vote in primary elections, but that it could not wait for lawmakers to act.

“[G]iven the steps necessary to transition to a fully closed primary in an orderly fashion, the Party cannot continue to wait and risk further political inaction and delay that could lead to open primaries (or even a bridge election) in 2028 as well,” the lawsuit read.

The Secretary of State’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

view more: next ›