this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
380 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
4026 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a suit on Monday against Samsung, Sony, LG, TCL, and Hisense, claiming in a press release that they "have been unlawfully collecting personal data through Automated Content Recognition ("ACR”) technology."

Paxton goes on to label ACR as "an uninvited, invisible digital invader," and in one of the five separately filed suits, he calls Samsung TVs "a mass surveillance system."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] x_pikl_x@lemmy.world 41 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Because the likely outcome will be a shady backroom business deal where they take a cut or just a payoff and you'll never hear about it again. It's Texas.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

No. The likely outcome is this. I'm going to use fake numbers for the sake of demonstrating a concept.

Samsung spies on you. From the data, they can harvest $500 million dollars throughout Texas tv watchers sending info back to South Korea.

Texas says "Hey! Whoa! You can't do that! You better stop or we'll fine you $20,000 dollars!"

Samsung says "Ok", and keeps doing it. Pays the fine, and takes it to court. They lose the case, but cost Texas $15,000 of court costs just to win. Then they keep doing it.

Now Texas thinks twice about charging the fee, because last time they only got $5,000 after defending themselves in court.

Meanwhile Samsung just views it as the cost of doing business. And carries on.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Angry upvote. This is the case when they are serious about it. See my other comment for how I feel Texas approaches it.

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

This is the way.

... in almost everything.